Engagements open nationwide9 to 16 business day turnaround

See Your Project Location(628) 225-1110infommcginvest.com

USDA B&I Feasibility Study Case Study: Rural Edge Colocation Facility on the US Highway 287 Corridor in Dumas, Texas

Michal Mohelsky, J.D., Principal of MMCG InvestMichal Mohelsky, J.D., FMVA, Practicing Affiliate of the Appraisal InstitutePublished October 4, 2026

A 6.63-acre listed commercial lot on US Highway 287 in Dumas, Moore County, Texas, asking $350,000, proposed for a 2.0 MW carrier-neutral edge colocation facility and resized in this study to a 500 kW phase one, because a 2.0 MW build at the 2026 greenfield benchmark of $17.6 million per MW cannot be funded inside the $25 million USDA Business and Industry debt cap. Underwritten under 7 CFR Part 5001 at a total project cost of $11,219,100, a restructured B&I loan of $4,300,000 at 85 percent guaranteed and $6,919,100 of cash equity, with debt service coverage negative in Years 1 and 2, 0.32x in Year 3, 0.95x in Year 4 and 1.28x in Year 5, carried by a $1,927,600 ramp reserve. The 1.00x threshold needs 367 kW contracted against about 180 kW of documented anchor demand, in a city where an incumbent edge operator already serves the largest school district. Determination: not feasible as proposed; conditionally feasible as restructured only on executed anchor contracts for at least 367 kW and an executed utility service agreement, both delivered before the loan note guarantee issues.

Model study prepared by MMCG Invest | Michal Mohelsky, J.D., FMVA | 4 October 2026

Study at a Glance

ItemFinding
SubjectHighway 287, Dumas, TX 79029; 6.63-acre commercial lot on the US 287 / US 87 Ports to Plains corridor
ListingLoopNet, asking $350,000 ($52,790 per acre), accessed 4 October 2026; listing ID, broker and days on market not captured (see Conditions)
ProgramUSDA Rural Development Business and Industry guaranteed loan, FY2026 terms (91 FR 11272, 9 March 2026)
Operating programOwner-operated carrier-neutral edge colocation, 500 kW critical IT, 100 cabinets at 5 kW average, expansion path to 2.0 MW on the same parcel
Total Subject Project Cost$11,219,100 ($22.44 million per MW all-in; $17.40 million per MW before financial cost)
Loan (restructured)$4,300,000, 85 percent guaranteed ($3,655,000), 8.50 percent fixed, 20-year amortization, annual debt service $447,800
Equity$6,919,100 cash (61.7 percent)
Stabilized revenue (Year 5)$1,783,000 at 400 kW contracted
Stabilized NOI (Year 5)$621,100 (34.8 percent margin)
Debt service coverageYear 1 negative, Year 2 negative, Year 3 0.32x, Year 4 0.95x, Year 5 1.28x
Break-even (Year 5 basis)241 kW at NOI break-even, 367 kW at 1.00x, 397 kW at 1.25x
Documented anchor demandAbout 180 kW (MMCG estimate from observed pod sizes)
Direct permanent jobs4 FTE
DeterminationNot feasible as proposed. Conditionally feasible as restructured only with executed master service agreements or take-or-pay LOIs for at least 367 kW, an executed SPS electric service agreement with a firm energization date, fee ownership satisfying 7 CFR 5001.126(a)(1), and the ramp reserve funded at closing

Determination

MMCG concludes that the project is not feasible as proposed. The 2.0 MW concept costs $35.2 million at the Cushman & Wakefield 2026 all-in greenfield benchmark of $17.6 million per MW (3 September 2026). The B&I cap of $25 million in total debt to one borrower under 7 CFR 5001.406(c), plus the 25 percent equity a new business must contribute when the loan note guarantee issues before construction completion, funds at most $33.3 million, so the concept does not fit the program. Resized to a 500 kW phase one at 75 percent loan-to-cost, the $8,414,300 loan carries $875,800 of annual debt service against $573,100 of stabilized cash flow available for debt service, 0.65x in Year 5.

As restructured, with the loan cut to $4,300,000 and cash equity raised to $6,919,100, the project reaches 1.28x in Year 5 and no earlier. Years 1 through 4 run below 1.00x and are carried by an equity-funded ramp reserve of $1,927,600. The Year 5 figure rests on 400 kW contracted. The documented anchor base in the trade area supports about 180 kW, and Duos Edge AI has operated a pod behind Dumas High School on land leased from Dumas ISD since 25 September 2025. At every coverage threshold the subject must contract more than all of the demand MMCG could identify, while the incumbent holds the largest anchor.

MMCG does not support issuing the guarantee on public evidence alone. The determination becomes favorable only if the following are delivered before the loan note guarantee issues: executed master service agreements or take-or-pay letters of intent for at least 367 kW on terms of three years or longer, the 1.00x threshold, and preferably 397 kW, the 1.25x threshold; an executed Southwestern Public Service electric service agreement stating capacity and an energization date; title in fee to the land, building and equipment in the borrower's name; and the ramp reserve funded at closing.

Scope and Basis of This Model Study

This is an MMCG model study: a feasibility analysis performed on a real, publicly listed parcel using public data only, prepared to show B&I lenders and rural sponsors how MMCG underwrites a small data center under 7 CFR Part 5001, Appendix A to Subpart D, when the program cap forces a resizing and the demand evidence stops short of the coverage threshold. The sponsor and borrower are hypothetical and unnamed. MMCG has no relationship with the seller or listing broker, and the analysis is not an offer, an appraisal or a recommendation to buy the parcel. Real companies appear only as competitors, cited comparables or the utility of record. Figures drawn from the listing, government sources and company releases are identified as such. Figures labeled MMCG assumption are underwriting inputs set from published benchmarks. Items that could not be verified from a primary source at the study date are listed in Conditions and Limitations rather than estimated silently. Projections run through Year 5, covering two years of stabilized operation as 5001.303(b)(4)(iii) requires.

Project Business Plan

The borrower would develop, own and operate a single-story hardened facility of about 6,000 square feet with 500 kW of critical IT capacity on the subject parcel, designed for expansion to 2.0 MW on the same site. The electrical design is 2N UPS with N+1 standby generation. Cooling is air-cooled direct expansion with hot-aisle containment and economization, using no evaporative water. The facility is carrier-neutral, with a meet-me room and two diverse fiber entrances. The borrower sells retail colocation by cabinet and cage, cross-connects, remote hands and managed services, and passes power through on a metered basis at the utility tariff with a PUE cap. The borrower holds the land, building and equipment in fee in a single operating entity that is the B&I borrower, with the principals providing the guarantees the program requires. Staffing is four full-time positions: a general manager who carries sales, two critical facility technicians and one NOC and customer technician, with remote monitoring and an on-call rotation covering the 24-hour floor.

Marketing and Sales Strategy

Sales target four groups in the order of their demonstrated need. First, Region 16 member districts and charter schools that still backhaul outside the region; before the first local pod, more than 50 Region 16 schools linked to a data center in Dallas about 500 miles away, and the regional network now reaches 59 of 60 districts. Second, Moore County Hospital District, for disaster recovery and imaging archive. Third, regional ISPs and wireless ISPs seeking a Panhandle aggregation point. Fourth, agricultural processors and oil and gas operators with SCADA and disaster recovery requirements. The general manager carries the sales role and commissions sit in administrative expense. Positioning against the incumbent rests on Tier III redundancy, carrier neutrality and fee-simple ownership.

Amenities

  • 100 cabinets, 5 kW standard and 10 to 20 kW high-density, with cage options from 100 kW
  • 2N UPS, N+1 generators with 24-hour fuel
  • Carrier-neutral meet-me room with two diverse entrances
  • 24/7 badge and biometric access, CCTV, secure loading dock
  • Customer work and staging room
  • Remote hands and managed services; SOC 2 Type II as a Year 2 target (MMCG assumption)

Site and Location Analysis

The subject is a 6.63-acre commercial lot on US Highway 287 in Dumas, the seat of Moore County and the core of the Dumas micropolitan area, on the US 287 / US 87 Ports to Plains corridor about 50 road miles north of Amarillo. Moore County's 2025 population estimate is 21,891. The Dumas Economic Development Corporation's 265-acre business park, with concrete roads and full underground utilities, sits on the same corridor; its tenants include a TxDOT district office, the Moore County Appraisal District, Texas DFPS, a Frito-Lay distribution facility and Blue Knight's crude terminal, and the EDC states it will consider deeding land to qualifying projects. Moore County Airport lies two miles west of the business district, and the EDC reports an expanded rail yard and trans-load facility.

Comparable land evidence brackets the asking price: 35 acres north of Dumas on US 287 listed at $5,500 per acre (9 November 2024), and 15.52 acres at 119 N Meredith Avenue at $931,200, or $60,000 per acre (LoopNet, accessed 4 October 2026). The subject's $52,790 per acre sits at the corridor-commercial end of that range. The parcel's APN, dimensions, topography, flood zone and hazard screens were not retrieved and are carried as conditions; MMCG expects 7 CFR Part 1970 review at the environmental assessment level for new construction on undeveloped land.

Zoning and Entitlement

The City of Dumas Code of Ordinances, Chapter 14, Article 14.05, establishes 19 use classes including the J and K Industrial, L First Manufacturing, M Second Manufacturing and PD Planned Development districts. The L district permits manufacturing or industrial operations of any kind not reserved to the M district, with a side yard of at least 3 feet if provided; the PD district allows industrial parks on tracts of 10 acres or more. A data center is not a listed use. MMCG's judgement is that a carrier-neutral facility with standby generation is an industrial operation within the L or J and K districts, and the City must confirm that classification in writing before closing. Rezoning, if required, follows the planning recommendation, public hearing and City Commission ordinance sequence recorded for Ordinance No. 1240. The subject's current district, height and coverage limits, generator noise limits and screening standards were not retrieved. MMCG carries a 3 to 4 month entitlement window if rezoning is needed and none if the use is classed as permitted (MMCG assumption).

Utilities, Fees and Property Tax

Electric. Southwestern Public Service Company (Xcel Energy) serves Dumas and added capacity at its Demon Substation northeast of the city on 15 May 2023. Service is under Primary General Service, Sheet IV-173, Revision 12, PUCT Docket 54634, approved 23 January 2024: a $76.13 monthly service availability charge, energy at $0.007731 per kWh plus the fuel cost recovery factor, and demand charges of $19.55 per kW in summer (June through September) and $16.57 per kW in winter. Billing demand is the highest 30-minute kW in the month. The sheet carries no ratchet, minimum billing demand or capacity commitment charge. SPS may require a contract above 200 kW with a minimum period and year-to-year renewal, and line extensions fall under its standard policy, with the cost split unquantified. SPS requested a fuel factor change in September 2026 that was not approved at the study date; MMCG carries $0.030 per kWh (MMCG assumption). SPS's proposed large-load tariff, filed September 2026, applies above 75 MW, and the utility stated it had no Panhandle data center proposals before it; the subject sits far below the threshold and carries no tariff floor, collateral or fixed charge. Capacity and an energization date at the parcel are not documented and are treated as a scenario.

Water, sewer and fuel. The City of Dumas supplies water and sewer; a listing on US 287 south documents a 10-inch domestic water main and an 8-inch sewer main on the corridor. Rates and connection fees were not retrieved. The design uses no evaporative water, and staff water comes from the City system, so no Safe Drinking Water Act public water system classification arises.

Fiber. FiberLight built the Region 16 10 Gbps education network under a contract dated 13 August 2024, added about 1,000 route miles across Texas (28 October 2025) and committed a further $350 million for about 1,400 route miles in West Texas (23 February 2026). Dumas ISD describes major carriers co-located at the local edge pod. A second carrier at the parcel is not verified. Dual diverse laterals are carried at $250,000 (MMCG assumption).

Property tax. The Moore County Appraisal District appraises real and business personal property at market value as of 1 January under the Texas Property Tax Code; machinery and equipment are taxed as business personal property and no freeport treatment applies. The combined rate inside the city is 2.380462 per $100 on the component rates MMCG compiled: Moore County 0.467100, Dumas ISD 1.106400, City of Dumas 0.480631 (2023, MCAD), Moore County Hospital District 0.236230 (adopted 24 September 2025), Palo Duro River Water District 0.013630, North Plains Groundwater Conservation District 0.027966 and Amarillo College District 0.048505. The EDC's 2020-21 table showed 2.604138; MMCG uses the newer component rates. Moore County adopted a 2026 rate raising maintenance and operations taxes by 3.04 percent, not retrieved. The study models assessed value at 60 percent of land, hard and equipment cost ($8,699,000 × 60 percent = $5,219,400) for $124,200 a year (MMCG assumption on the value ratio). No Chapter 312 abatement guidelines were found for the County or City; the EDC's Community Investment Program offers negotiated incentives under a performance agreement, not modeled.

State incentives. The Texas data center sales and use tax exemption under Tax Code 151.359 requires a single-occupant building of at least 100,000 square feet, at least 20 qualifying jobs at 120 percent or more of the county average wage and at least $200 million of investment over five years; the large-project tier under 151.3595 requires $500 million, 40 jobs and a 20 MW transmission contract. The subject misses every threshold. Combined local sales tax is 8.25 percent and applies to equipment purchases.

Trade Area Demographics

The trade area is defined by latency, not county lines: a round-trip radius of about 5 milliseconds, roughly 250 fiber route miles (MMCG assumption), which covers the 26,000-square-mile Region 16 territory along US 287 south to Amarillo and US 385 and US 60 southwest to Hereford. Region 16 Education Service Center serves 60 public school districts and three charter schools, 226 campuses, average daily attendance above 83,000 and more than 12,800 staff (Region 16 release, 5 March 2025). Dumas ISD's 2025 maintenance and operations taxable value is $2.307 billion (Texas Comptroller). County income and labor figures were not compiled; for the subject, the demographic question is the institutional and commercial customer base, not the resident population.

Demand and Penetration

Institutional census. Region 16 ESC in Amarillo, 60 districts and 226 campuses, hosted since March 2025 by a Duos pod at 5800 Bell Street. Dumas ISD, approximately 4,300 students and staff across seven campuses, hosted by the Duos pod behind Dumas High School, which the district's IT director told KAMR will serve about 53 Panhandle schools as a central point for connectivity, internet access and secured data transfer. Hereford ISD, more than 4,000 students across 900 square miles, served by a Duos pod since 14 January 2026. Moore County Hospital District, a critical access hospital with 80 total and 49 certified beds on an older federal profile, 201 to 500 employees, and a 47-bed nursing home. Moore County government, the TxDOT district office and Texas DFPS.

Commercial demand. JBS USA's Cactus beef plant employs more than 3,700 team members and partners and pays $2.9 billion a year for livestock (KFDA, 4 February 2025); its $150 million expansion broke ground 27 February 2026 and is due to open in 2027. Valero, Blue Knight Energy Partners and the drilling operators the EDC names (Apache, Chesapeake, ConocoPhillips, BP, Pioneer) carry SCADA and disaster recovery requirements. No WISP subscriber counts, bank or credit union recovery mandates, or AI inference demand with a documented basis were found.

Load-inquiry evidence. SPS stated on 28 September 2026 that it had no data center proposals before it in the Panhandle. The only large-load activity found is hyperscale: Fermi America's Project Matador near Amarillo, planned at 11 GW by the mid-2030s with TensorWave signed as anchor in August 2026. Hyperscale activity of that kind says nothing about retail edge demand.

Penetration test. Named anchor demand is about 180 kW, an MMCG estimate built from observed pod sizes: one education-consortium pod-equivalent of 90 kW (15 cabinets at 6 kW, the Duos profile DCD reported), hospital disaster recovery and imaging at 40 kW, county and state agencies at 20 kW, and ISP and WISP aggregation at 30 kW.

Threshold (Year 5)Contracted kWShare of named anchor demand
NOI break-even241134 percent
1.00x debt service coverage367204 percent
1.15x385214 percent
1.25x397220 percent
1.35x408227 percent

At every threshold the subject must contract more than all of the identified demand, while an incumbent already holds the largest anchor. Public evidence identifies the institutions but not their kW. A letter of intent or master service agreement would have to show contracted kW and cabinet count, the monthly recurring charge, a term of 36 months or more, a take-or-pay or early-termination payment at least equal to remaining base rent, a start-date quarter and, for school districts, E-rate eligibility of the related transport.

Competitive Supply

MMCG identified six competing facilities and the incumbent alternative. No competitor publishes a rate card that MMCG could verify on the operator's own site, so price comparisons rest on national achieved figures.

Competitor Number 1 Duos Edge AI, Dumas EDC This facility is located at 421 W 4th Street, Dumas, behind Dumas High School, on land Dumas ISD leases to the operator. It became operational on 25 September 2025 and serves Dumas ISD, with about 53 Panhandle schools expected to use it. Region 16's release describes Duos pods at 100 kW-plus per cabinet capability, 90-day deployment and placement within 12 miles of end users; DCD describes each pod as 15 cabinets in a 55-foot by 13-foot enclosure at typical loads of 5 to 6 kW per cabinet and up to 300 kW with a cooling change. Carrier count and cross-connect pricing are not published. No rate card.

Competitor Number 2 Duos Edge AI, Amarillo EDC (Region 16 ESC) This facility is located at 5800 Bell Street, Amarillo, described as Tier 2 with full SOC compliance, interconnecting to major carriers, built with FiberLight. Grand opening 18 March 2025. No rate card.

Competitor Number 3 Duos Edge AI, Amarillo (Potter County site) This facility is located at 810 to 814 S Tyler Street, Amarillo, on Potter County land, deployed in March 2026 beside an AT&T facility and AW Broadband. No rate card.

Competitor Number 4 Lumen Amarillo 1 This facility is located at 512 SE 8th Avenue, Amarillo, with 5,000 square feet total and 1,731 square feet of colocation space, carrier-owned with diverse fiber, listing HIPAA, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, SOC 1 and SOC 2. No public rate card.

Competitor Number 5 Duos Edge AI, Hereford EDC This facility is located at 601 N 25 Mile Avenue, Hereford, at the Hereford ISD administration site, operational since 14 January 2026, using no water for cooling. No rate card.

Competitor Number 6 Dallas metro carrier hotels (incumbent alternative) The Dallas INFOMART at 1950 N Stemmons Freeway is the region's principal carrier hotel and the kind of distant site Panhandle schools backhauled to before the local pods, about 500 miles away. Rate cards not retrieved.

Edge capital in the radius is flowing to the incumbent rather than to new entrants. Duos announced a $176 million GPU-as-a-service agreement in September 2025, partners with Fortress Investment Group through Duos Energy to power four 50 MW data centers at the Pampa Energy Center with up to 500 MW of self-generated natural gas power and up to 200 MW of wind, and targeted 15 pods by the end of 2025. No new retail edge facility under construction or approved in Moore County other than the incumbent's was identified.

Pricing and Rate Positioning

ProductSubject rateBasis
5 kW cabinet, all-in space$1,350 per month ($270 per kW)Inside the CREFC retail range of $200 to $400; below Digital Realty's achieved $293 per kW for 0 to 1 MW Americas leases (Q2 2026, 23 July 2026)
10 to 20 kW high-density cabinet$240 per kW per monthDensity discount
Cage, 100 to 250 kW$230 per kW per monthAbove CBRE's 250 to 500 kW primary-market asking average of $196.25 in H2 2025, up 4.3 percent in H1 2026 (about $204.69); justified by local latency
Blended Year 1$250 per kW per month15 percent below Digital Realty's 0 to 1 MW achieved rate
Cross-connect$150 per monthMMCG assumption
Remote hands$125 per hourMMCG assumption
PowerMetered pass-through at the SPS tariff, PUE capped at 1.45, plus 5 percent administrationModified gross plus electric
Term, escalator, renewal36 months, 3 percent annual, auto-renewing yearlyEquinix 10-K pattern of 1 to 5 year terms then auto-renewal
Churn1.5 percent per quarter, embedded in net contracted kWBelow Equinix's 1.8 percent actual and 2.0 to 2.5 percent target; education contracts are sticky (MMCG judgement)

Ramp and Occupancy

YearAverage contracted kWRate per kW per monthUtilization of 500 kWBase rent
Year 1100$250.0020 percent$300,000
Year 2200$257.5040 percent$618,000
Year 3300$265.2360 percent$954,800
Year 4370$273.1874 percent$1,212,900
Year 5400$281.3880 percent$1,350,600

Anchor quarters are MMCG assumptions for hypothetical contracts; no LOI exists: an education consortium of Region 16 member districts at 100 kW from Q2 Year 1, hospital disaster recovery at 40 kW from Q3 Year 1, ISP and WISP aggregation at 30 kW from Q4 Year 1, public agencies at 20 kW from Q2 Year 2, and commercial retail across agricultural processing, energy and MSPs for the balance of the ramp in Years 2 through 5.

Project Cost Estimate

Location: Highway 287, Dumas, Moore County, Texas 79029 Site: 6.63 acres | Building: about 6,000 square feet | Critical IT load: 500 kW

ItemCostCost in %Cost per MW of critical IT
Land Cost
Land acquisition (listed asking price)$350,0003.12%$700,000
Closing, title, survey, ALTA$35,0000.31%$70,000
Phase I ESA and geotechnical$30,0000.27%$60,000
7 CFR Part 1970 environmental review$25,0000.22%$50,000
Total Land Cost$440,0003.92%$880,000
Hard Cost
Site work, grading, drainage, paving$450,0004.01%$900,000
Utility interconnection and line extension (SPS standard policy)$350,0003.12%$700,000
Transmission upgrade allocation (below the 75 MW large-load threshold)$00.00%$0
Building shell and core (prefabricated hardened build)$1,500,00013.37%$3,000,000
Electrical (service entrance, switchgear, 2N UPS, PDU, N+1 generators, fuel storage, ATS)$2,600,00023.17%$5,200,000
Mechanical (air-cooled DX, CRAH, containment, controls)$1,200,00010.70%$2,400,000
Fire detection and suppression$220,0001.96%$440,000
Physical security and access control$150,0001.34%$300,000
Fiber entrance and laterals (dual diverse)$250,0002.23%$500,000
Commissioning, Levels 1 to 5$120,0001.07%$240,000
Hard cost contingency (10%)$684,0006.10%$1,368,000
Total Hard Cost$7,524,00067.06%$15,048,000
Equipment
Racks, cabinets and busway (100 cabinets)$350,0003.12%$700,000
DCIM and BMS$150,0001.34%$300,000
NOC and office fit-out$120,0001.07%$240,000
Spare parts and tooling$60,0000.53%$120,000
Maintenance vehicle$55,0000.49%$110,000
Total Equipment$735,0006.55%$1,470,000
Financial Cost
USDA guarantee fee (3.0% of the $3,655,000 guaranteed portion)$109,7000.98%$219,400
Lender packaging, closing and legal$120,0001.07%$240,000
Appraisal, feasibility study and environmental$65,0000.58%$130,000
Builder's risk insurance$45,0000.40%$90,000
Property tax during construction$10,0000.09%$20,000
Utility deposit (sources-and-uses item)$60,0000.53%$120,000
Interest during construction (12 months, 50% average draw, 8.50%)$182,8001.63%$365,600
Working capital and ramp reserve (Years 1 to 4 shortfall)$1,927,60017.18%$3,855,200
Total Financial Cost$2,520,10022.46%$5,040,200
Total Subject Project Cost$11,219,100100.00%$22,438,200

Source: Marshall & Swift CoreLogic, MMCG

The annual retention fee of 0.55 percent is an operating cost and sits in the operating budget. No letter of credit is required because the SPS Primary General Service sheet sets no collateral; the utility deposit is a sources-and-uses item. The reserve equals cash flow available for debt service less debt service, summed over Years 1 through 4: $930,300, $669,100, $304,100 and $24,100.

Before financial cost the subject costs $17.40 million per MW, at the Cushman & Wakefield all-in greenfield benchmark of $17.6 million per MW excluding chips (3 September 2026) and inside its reported range of $8.9 million to $23.3 million. The subject's figure is a full-scope turnkey build and is not comparable to JLL's shell-and-core figure of about $11.3 million per MW, which excludes the mechanical and electrical plant. Electrical plus interconnection is 26.3 percent of total cost, close to Cushman's 21 percent for power infrastructure. Including the ramp reserve, all-in cost is $22.44 million per MW; the premium is the price of a small build with a slow ramp.

Loan Assumptions

ItemAs proposed (phase one)As restructured
LTC Ratio75.0%38.3%
Loan$8,414,300$4,300,000
Guaranteed portion80% ($6,731,400)85% ($3,655,000)
Equity$2,804,800 cash (25.0%)$6,919,100 cash (61.7%)
Interest Rate8.50% fixed (prime 7.00% per Federal Reserve H.15, 2 October 2026, plus 1.50% MMCG assumption)Same
Amortization20 years20 years
Annual Debt Service$875,800$447,800
Year 5 DSCR0.65x1.28x

Twenty years blends the building's useful life of 30 to 40 years with the 15 to 20 year lives of the UPS, generator and cooling plant, inside the 40-year ceiling. The guarantee percentage moves from 80 to 85 percent because the restructured loan falls below $5 million (91 FR 11272). No non-cash equity is admitted; EDC-deeded land would count at appraised value but is not modeled.

USDA Program Compliance

TestCitationFindingType
Rural determination5001.3; 5001.105(c)Dumas lies outside the Amarillo urbanized area and far below 50,000 population. The Rural Development Property Eligibility Map printout is still to be saved.Rule applied; evidence pending
Eligible purposes5001.105(b)(1), (b)(2), (b)(3); (b)(10) for fiber subject to 1738.106(a) and 1738.107Fiber entrance of $250,000 is 2.2 percent of cost, inside the 10 percent broadband limit of 5001.121Rule
Control5001.126(a)(1)The borrower must own the land, building and equipment in fee, evidenced by deed, title policy and equipment invoices. A ground lease of school district land on the incumbent's pattern would fail this test.Rule
Related entities5001.126(a)(2)Any affiliated operating company must be a co-borrowerRule
Passive rental5001.115(g); 5001.302The borrower controls tenants and supplies power, cooling, security, remote hands and network services, so the facility is not primarily passive rental. Because revenue remains largely space rent, the State Office should rule in a preliminary eligibility review.Judgement call
Lease payments5001.115(e); 5001.122(h), (n)No loan funds go to lease payments; customer contracts are revenue, not guaranteed obligationsRule
Equity tier5001.105(d)A new business without debt-service-covering contracts, with the loan note guarantee likely issued before construction completion, needs 25 percent. The restructured case provides 61.7 percent.Rule
Feasibility trigger5001.306(a)(3)(i)Required: new business, loan above $1 millionRule
$25 million cap5001.406(c)The 2.0 MW concept exceeds what the cap plus equity can fund; phase one at $4.30 million fitsRule
Jobs5001.318(d)(6)4 direct permanent FTE, reported separately from about 40 peak construction jobs and induced jobs (MMCG assumption); the project does not reach the five-job priority scoreRule plus assumption
Capital per direct jobPublished benchmarks$2.80 million per job ($11.22 million ÷ 4), against $13 million all-time and $54 million for 2020 to 2025 Virginia projects (Food & Water Watch, January 2026), $20.2 million (Illinois Economic Policy Institute, 2026) and $18.6 million (Google Cedar Rapids)Computation
Relocation and DOL review5001.118(b); 5001.306(a)(1)The facility is new, not a relocation, and adds four employees; the text of 5001.118(b) was not retrieved in this passCondition
PrecedentRD and RUS award chartsNo closed B&I financing to a data center borrower was foundDocumented absence

Operating Expenses

The Year 5 operating budget at 400 kW contracted and 500 kW commissioned is built by line for an owner-operated edge facility in the Texas Panhandle.

Line (Year 5)AmountPer kW per month (400 kW)Per MW per year (0.5 MW)
Property tax (MCAD method)$124,200$25.88$248,400
Insurance (property, liability, cyber)$75,000$15.63$150,000
Payroll and benefits, 4 FTE$380,000$79.17$760,000
Purchased power (PUE 1.45; no minimum-bill component)$258,200$53.79$516,400
Water and sewer$6,000$1.25$12,000
Electrical, mechanical, generator and UPS battery contracts$110,000$22.92$220,000
Repairs$25,000$5.21$50,000
Janitorial and security monitoring$30,000$6.25$60,000
Network transport and carrier fees$60,000$12.50$120,000
DCIM, software and licensing$20,000$4.17$40,000
Administrative, marketing, commissions, card processing$55,000$11.46$110,000
USDA annual retention fee (0.55% of outstanding guaranteed balance)$18,500$3.85$37,000
Management feeNone, owner-operated
Total operating expenses$1,161,900$242.06$2,323,800
Net operating income$621,100$129.40$1,242,200
NOI margin34.8 percent
Lifecycle reserve ($10 per kW per month; KBRA range $7 to $18)$48,000$10.00$96,000
Cash flow available for debt service$573,100$119.40$1,146,200

The margin sits below the 40 to 50 percent retail colocation range for three reasons. Payroll of 4 FTE on 0.5 MW equals 800 per 100 MW against a benchmark of 20 to 30, because a 24-hour critical facility needs a minimum crew at any scale, and payroll is 21 percent of revenue. Property tax at a combined 2.38 percent on business personal property with no abatement is 7 percent of revenue. Pass-through power earns only the 5 percent administration margin, which dilutes the percentage. Purchased power is carried at the SPS tariff with a $0.030 fuel factor, a 65 percent IT load factor and $35,000 of annual house load (MMCG assumptions).

Five-Year Pro Forma and Debt Service Coverage

Restructured case.

LineYear 1Year 2Year 3Year 4Year 5
Contracted kW / commissioned kW100 / 500200 / 500300 / 500370 / 500400 / 500
Utilization20%40%60%74%80%
Base rent$300,000$618,000$954,800$1,212,900$1,350,600
Power reimbursement$58,600$117,200$175,800$216,800$234,400
Cross-connect$27,000$54,000$81,000$99,000$108,000
Managed services and other$30,000$50,000$70,000$85,000$90,000
Total revenue$415,600$839,200$1,281,600$1,613,700$1,783,000
Total operating expenses$886,100$1,036,500$1,101,900$1,145,600$1,161,900
Net operating income($470,500)($197,300)$179,700$468,100$621,100
NOI marginn/mn/m14.0%29.0%34.8%
Lifecycle reserve$12,000$24,000$36,000$44,400$48,000
Cash flow available for debt service($482,500)($221,300)$143,700$423,700$573,100
Unrecovered minimum-bill floor$0$0$0$0$0
Annual debt service$447,800$447,800$447,800$447,800$447,800
Cash flow after debt service($930,300)($669,100)($304,100)($24,100)$125,300
Debt service coverage(1.08x)(0.49x)0.32x0.95x1.28x

The ramp reserve of $1,927,600 funds the Years 1 through 4 deficits with no margin. No fixed charge coverage ratio applies, because the tariff carries no minimum bill. The as-proposed phase one, with $875,800 of debt service, produces 0.65x in Year 5.

Break-Even Analysis

At Year 5 rates, each contracted kW contributes $3,779.60 a year to cash flow available for debt service, and fixed costs including the reserve are $938,700.

ThresholdContracted kWUtilizationAgainst the 400 kW forecast
NOI break-even24148.1 percent159 kW below forecast
1.00x debt service coverage36773.4 percent33 kW below
1.15x38576.9 percent15 kW below
1.25x39779.3 percent3 kW below
1.35x40881.7 percent8 kW above forecast

The 1.25x threshold sits 3 kW under the forecast. That is the credit fact: the facility covers the program's expected coverage only at 79 percent utilization, and the identified demand supports 36 percent.

Sensitivity Analysis

Case (Year 5, restructured)Total revenueNet operating incomeDebt service coverage
Base case$1,783,000$621,1001.28x
Rent 10 percent below forecast$1,647,900$486,0000.98x
Utilization 10 points below forecast (350 kW)$1,560,200$426,2000.86x
Utilization 20 points below forecast (300 kW)$1,337,300$231,2000.44x
Purchased power 20 percent above forecast$1,829,900$616,3001.27x
PUE 1.6 with the pass-through cap held at 1.45$1,783,000$598,0001.23x
Energization delayed 12 months (Year 5 at base Year 4)$1,613,700$468,1000.95x
Capital 15 percent over budget, debt-funded (debt service $576,800)$1,783,000$602,5000.96x
Loss of the largest anchor (100 kW)$1,337,300$231,2000.44x
Interest rate 100 basis points higher (debt service $481,000)$1,783,000$621,1001.19x
Current use continued (vacant lot, carrying tax about $8,300)$0($8,300)n/a

Coverage is driven by demand: rent, utilization and anchor retention. Power cost has little effect because the tariff has no floor and costs pass through. A 12-month energization delay would also need about $448,000 of additional carry that the capital stack does not fund.

Risk Factors and Mitigants

  • The incumbent. Duos pods in Dumas, Hereford and Amarillo already serve the education anchors. Mitigant: executed master service agreements for at least 367 kW before the loan note guarantee issues; positioning on Tier III redundancy, carrier neutrality and fee-simple ownership.
  • Anchor concentration. The largest anchor is 25 percent of the Year 5 base. Mitigant: cap any single customer at 25 percent of contracted kW and require early-termination payments.
  • Energization timing. Capacity at the parcel is not documented. Mitigant: an executed SPS service contract with the in-service date as a condition precedent.
  • Fuel factor. SPS's September 2026 request was pending. Mitigant: metered pass-through.
  • Passive rental under 5001.115(g). Mitigant: document the service scope and operator control in the operating agreement and obtain the State Office's view under 5001.302.
  • Property tax. 2.38 percent with no abatement. Mitigant: pursue Chapter 312 or an EDC performance agreement before closing.
  • Thin payroll for 24-hour operations. Mitigant: remote monitoring contract plus an on-call rotation.

Conditions and Limitations

The determination is subject to the following conditions precedent:

  1. Executed master service agreements or take-or-pay letters of intent for at least 367 kW on terms of 36 months or longer, with early-termination payments at least equal to remaining base rent, delivered before the loan note guarantee issues.
  2. An executed SPS electric service agreement stating capacity and a firm energization date.
  3. Title in fee to the land, building and equipment in the borrower's name, satisfying 7 CFR 5001.126(a)(1).
  4. The ramp reserve of $1,927,600 funded in cash at closing.
  5. The State Office's preliminary eligibility review under 5001.302 on the 5001.115(g) question.

The following items could not be verified from a primary source at the study date and are disclosed: the subject listing ID, broker, days on market, APN, coordinates and dimensions; the Rural Development Property Eligibility Map result, the 2020 census population for Dumas and the urbanized-area boundary printout; FEMA, seismic, wind, wildfire, radon, wetlands, historic and species screens; the parcel's zoning district, data center use classification, height, coverage, noise and screening limits; the SPS fuel factor for October 2026, parcel capacity, line extension cost split and energization date; City of Dumas water and sewer rates and connection fees; the second fiber carrier at the parcel, lateral cost and FCC Broadband Data Collection coverage; 2025 and 2026 tax rates for all units except the hospital district, and Chapter 312 availability; every competitor's rate card; the hospital bed count and employee band, which come from secondary profiles; the text of 7 CFR 5001.118(b); and the FY2027 B&I fee notice, none having been published as of 4 October 2026.

Assumptions that are judgement calls rather than sourced figures: the 500 kW phase one scope and 2.0 MW expansion path; every cost line other than the land price; the 1.50 percent spread, 8.50 percent rate and 20-year amortization; the $0.030 fuel factor, $35,000 house load and 65 percent IT load factor; design PUE and the 1.45 cap with a 5 percent administration margin; the rate card, escalator, term and churn; the ramp and anchor quarters; the 180 kW anchor estimate and its split; cross-connect, managed services and remote hands pricing; assessed value at 60 percent of cost and the use of 2023 component rates; 4 FTE and all operating expense amounts; the $10 lifecycle reserve; the 250-mile latency radius; the zoning classification and entitlement timeline; the 5001.115(g) conclusion; and about 40 peak construction jobs.

What the Lender Received

  • The written determination with its five conditions precedent and the as-proposed and restructured cases stated side by side
  • The candidate screen across five territories and the subject selection rationale
  • The site and location analysis with the latency radius as the trade area and the corridor land evidence
  • The competitor census with the incumbent's deployment dates and pod profile, and the absence of any verified rate card disclosed
  • The rate card, the ramp to 400 kW and the hypothetical anchor schedule
  • The project cost estimate and loan assumptions in MMCG's standard format, with the reserve sized to the Years 1 through 4 shortfall
  • The operating budget by line with the margin reconciled to the retail colocation range
  • The five-year pro forma, debt service coverage by year and break-even at each threshold
  • The sensitivity cases, including the continued current use that defines the comparison
  • The Part 5001 compliance matrix: rural test, eligible purposes, control, passive rental, equity tier, feasibility trigger, the cap, jobs and capital per job

The lender did not receive executed customer contracts, an SPS service agreement, an appraisal, a Phase I ESA or a title commitment. Each is a condition of any favorable determination.

This model study applies the methodology described on MMCG's Data Center Feasibility Study and USDA Data Center Feasibility Study pages. MMCG prepares data center feasibility studies for SBA 7(a) and 504, USDA Business and Industry and REAP, and conventional lenders nationwide, with engagements from $4,900 and delivery in 9 to 16 business days.

Sources

  1. LoopNet, Highway 287, Dumas, TX 79029, 6.63 acres, $350,000; 119 N Meredith Avenue, 15.52 acres, $931,200; accessed 4 October 2026
  2. LandSearch, 35 acres on US 287 north of Dumas, listed 9 November 2024; Gillispie Land Group, 2700 S Dumas Avenue listing; accessed 4 October 2026
  3. Dumas Economic Development Corporation, The Dumas Business Park, Funding Programs, Taxation and Oil and Natural Gas pages, accessed 4 October 2026
  4. City of Dumas Code of Ordinances, Chapter 14, Article 14.05, Divisions 1, 13 and 16, and Ordinance No. 1240 (eCode360), accessed 4 October 2026
  5. Xcel Energy / Southwestern Public Service Company, Electric Tariff Sheet IV-173, Revision 12, Primary General Service, PUCT Docket 54634, approved 23 January 2024
  6. KFDA NewsChannel 10, Demon Substation report, 15 May 2023; SPS fuel factor request, 9 September 2026; SPS large-load tariff proposal, 28 September 2026; JBS Cactus plant employment, 4 February 2025; Dumas ISD edge pod, 19 September 2025
  7. Southwest Power Pool, compliance filing ER26-1323-002, Conditional High Impact Large Load Service, 6 July 2026
  8. Moore County Appraisal District, County of Moore 2023 Tax Rates; Moore County Hospital District, Taxes page (rate adopted 24 September 2025); Moore County notice of 2026 adopted rate
  9. Texas Comptroller, 2025 ISD Summary Worksheet, Dumas ISD
  10. Texas Tax Code 151.359 and 151.3595; H.B. 1223 (83rd Legislature) enrolled text
  11. Region 16 Education Service Center and iMiller PR, Edge Data Center releases, 13 January 2025 and 5 March 2025
  12. FiberLight, Region 16 contract release, 13 August 2024; West Texas network releases, 28 October 2025 and 23 February 2026
  13. Duos Technologies Group, Duos Deploys 5th Edge Data Center, 16 September 2025; Hereford open house release, 9 June 2026; MyHighPlains (KAMR) report on the Dumas pod
  14. DatacenterDynamics, Duos Edge AI: Educating at the Edge; Hereford, Abilene, second Amarillo and Duos Energy / Fortress Pampa reports
  15. High Plains Journal, JBS Cactus expansion groundbreaking, 2 March 2026
  16. Federal Reserve Board, H.15 Selected Interest Rates, 2 October 2026
  17. Federal Register, 91 FR 11272, OneRD Annual Notice of Guarantee Fee Rates for Fiscal Year 2026, 9 March 2026
  18. 7 CFR Part 5001, sections 5001.3, .105, .115, .121, .122, .126, .302, .303, .306, .318 and .406, and Appendix A to Subpart D
  19. Cushman & Wakefield, 2026 Data Center Development Cost Guide, 3 September 2026; JLL, 2026 Global Data Center Outlook
  20. Digital Realty, Second Quarter 2026 Results, 23 July 2026; Equinix, Form 10-K FY2025 and Q2 2026 results; CBRE, North America Data Center Trends H1 2026, 27 August 2026; CRE Finance Council, Data Center E-Primer, 25 February 2026; KBRA presale, DataBank 2026-1, 12 January 2026
  21. Uptime Institute, Global Data Center Survey 2025; Governing, 24 June 2026; Food & Water Watch, Artificial Jobs, January 2026; Illinois Economic Policy Institute, 2026
  22. Marshall & Swift CoreLogic, cost data, 2026

Request Feasibility Study Proposal

Contact MMCG Invest

Michal Mohelsky, J.D., Principal of MMCG Invest

Michal Mohelsky, J.D., FMVA

Principal in charge · MMCG Invest, LLC

Emailmichal@mmcginvest.com

Direct(628) 225-1110

Prefer to talk first?Book a 30-minute scoping call

Engagement Floor

From $4,900

Fixed-fee at proposal stage

Turnaround

9 to 16 business days

Rush from 5 business days available

San Francisco Office

27 Maiden Lane · Union Square
27 Maiden Lane, Suite 625
San Francisco CA 94108
Directions

Prefer a five-question quick start?Start a StudyFirst response within 12 business hours

Proposal Request

Tell us about the project.

12hSLA

MMCG never shares contact details with third parties.
Replies come from a senior analyst, not a sales team.