The PepsiCo Paradox

From a Pharmacist’s Formula to a $92 Billion Empire—and the Crossroads That Now Defines It

PepsiCo, Inc. is not merely a beverage company. It is, by any serious measure, one of the most sprawling consumer goods empires on earth—a $91.9 billion revenue machine headquartered in Purchase, New York, with 318,000 employees, 868 physical locations spanning 116 million square feet, and meaningful competitive positions across at least nine distinct U.S. manufacturing industries. From the carbonated soft drink lines that built its name to the Frito-Lay snack empire that now drives its most profitable segment, PepsiCo’s portfolio is a study in deliberate diversification. It has delivered 53 consecutive years of dividend increases. Its brands—Pepsi, Lay’s, Doritos, Gatorade, Mountain Dew, Quaker, Aquafina—read like a lexicon of American consumer culture.

Yet beneath the headline figures, a more unsettling picture has emerged. The Pepsi brand itself has slipped to fourth place among U.S. carbonated soft drinks, overtaken by Dr Pepper and Sprite. North American volumes have declined for five consecutive quarters. Activist investor Elliott Management has built a $4 billion stake—one of the largest such positions ever taken in consumer staples—demanding structural change. And across nearly every industry in which PepsiCo competes, the MMCG database reveals a persistent and striking anomaly: the company’s revenue per employee lags both the industry average and the segment average, raising fundamental questions about operational efficiency at scale.

For lenders and investors evaluating PepsiCo as a tenant, counterparty, or credit exposure, the central question is no longer whether this is a sound enterprise—it manifestly is—but whether the direction of travel on margins, market share, and productivity can be reversed before it erodes the very credit profile that makes PepsiCo one of the most coveted industrial tenants in the world.

I. ORIGINS

A Pharmacist’s Formula, a Depression-Era Gamble, and the Merger That Changed Everything

PepsiCo’s story begins in 1893, in a pharmacy in New Bern, North Carolina, where Caleb Davis Bradham created “Brad’s Drink”—a carbonated concoction containing pepsin enzyme and kola nuts. Renamed Pepsi-Cola in 1898 and trademarked in 1903, the brand grew rapidly, reaching 240 franchised bottlers across 24 states by 1910. Then it collapsed. Bradham’s disastrous sugar speculation during World War I drove the company into bankruptcy in 1923. The brand was revived in 1931 by Charles Guth for the astonishing sum of $14,000—a figure that, in hindsight, may qualify as the most consequential bargain in the history of American consumer goods.

What transformed Pepsi from a Depression-era also-ran into a genuine national competitor was a brilliantly simple idea: offering twelve ounces for a nickel when Coca-Cola sold six. The “Twice as Much for a Nickel” campaign was a masterclass in value positioning, and it established a strategic identity—Pepsi as the challenger, the brand of the masses, the insurgent against Coca-Cola’s establishment—that persists to this day.

The pivotal structural moment came on June 8, 1965, when Pepsi-Cola Company merged with Frito-Lay, Inc. to form PepsiCo, Inc. Herman W. Lay became Chairman; Donald M. Kendall became President and CEO. Combined initial sales stood at $510 million with approximately 19,000 employees. Frito-Lay itself had been formed just four years earlier from the merger of the Frito Company, founded in 1932 by Charles Elmer Doolin, and the H.W. Lay Company. This fusion of America’s leading salty snack maker with its number-two soft drink company created a dual-engine business model that remains PepsiCo’s defining structural advantage over pure-play beverage rival Coca-Cola six decades later.

Under Kendall (1965–1986), PepsiCo became an aggressive challenger brand. Pepsi was the first U.S. consumer product sold in the Soviet Union. The Pepsi Challenge blind taste tests, launched in 1975, became iconic marketing that reshaped an industry. Under Wayne Calloway (1986–1996), revenue exploded from $8 billion to over $30 billion, driven by an ambitious foray into restaurant ownership that would ultimately prove unsustainable.

II. THE ACQUISITION MACHINE

Six Decades of Portfolio Reinvention

PepsiCo’s corporate history is, in many respects, an acquisition history. Every strategic era has been defined by what the company bought, what it sold, and what it chose to build. The restaurant era—Pizza Hut in 1977, Taco Bell in 1978, KFC in 1986—represented a bold bet on vertical diversification that ultimately failed to earn its cost of capital. When Roger Enrico spun off all restaurant operations as Tricon Global Restaurants (later Yum! Brands) in October 1997, it freed the balance sheet and management bandwidth for the transformative deals that followed.

The $3.3 billion acquisition of Tropicana in 1998 brought juice category entry and a healthier portfolio narrative. But it was the $13.4 billion Quaker Oats deal in 2001—PepsiCo’s largest ever—that proved most consequential. Quaker brought Gatorade, which then held roughly 80% of the U.S. sports drink market and now anchors a franchise generating approximately $12 billion annually. That single acquisition fundamentally altered PepsiCo’s competitive position in ways that continue to reverberate.

Indra Nooyi’s tenure as CEO (2006–2018) was transformational. The first woman to lead a Fortune 50 company, Nooyi launched the “Performance with Purpose” framework, reclassifying PepsiCo’s portfolio into “Fun for You,” “Better for You,” and “Good for You” tiers. She executed the $7.8 billion bottling consolidation in 2010, the $5.4 billion Wimm-Bill-Dann acquisition that made PepsiCo Russia’s largest food-and-beverage company, and the $3.2 billion SodaStream deal. Revenue grew from approximately $35 billion to $63.5 billion under her leadership.

Ramon Laguarta, a 22-year PepsiCo veteran who assumed the CEO role in October 2018, initially continued Nooyi’s trajectory while adding his own sustainability framework—“pep+” (PepsiCo Positive). Revenue grew from $63 billion to nearly $92 billion. But his most consequential strategic pivot has come in the last two years: the acquisitions of Siete Foods ($1.2 billion), Poppi ($1.95 billion), and an expanded $585 million Celsius stake signal a deliberate portfolio shift toward functional, better-for-you, and culturally diverse products—a direct response to shifting consumer preferences and the GLP-1 medication trend reshaping snacking habits.

Landmark Transactions

Year	Target	Value	Strategic Impact
1965	Frito-Lay (merger)	Stock swap	Created PepsiCo; snack diversification
1997	Restaurant spin-off	—	Exited restaurants; created Yum! Brands
1998	Tropicana	$3.3B	Juice category entry
2001	Quaker Oats	$13.4B	Largest deal; brought Gatorade
2010	Bottling consolidation	$7.8B	Vertical integration of NA bottling
2020	Rockstar Energy	$3.85B	Energy drink market entry
2024	Siete Foods	$1.2B	Multicultural grain-free snacks
2025	Poppi	$1.95B	Prebiotic soda; functional beverages

Source: MMCG database, SEC filings, public transaction records.

III. FINANCIAL ARCHITECTURE

Profitability, Leverage, and the Margin Compression Problem

PepsiCo’s financial statements reveal a company that generates enormous cash flows—more than $7 billion annually in free cash flow—but carries meaningful leverage. This is a profile entirely typical of mature consumer staples businesses, but one that requires calibrated analysis rather than casual reassurance.

Revenue has grown from $67.2 billion in 2019 to $91.9 billion in FY2024, representing a compound annual growth rate of approximately 6.5%. This is impressive topline expansion for a company of PepsiCo’s scale, though a significant portion was price-driven during the inflationary period of 2021–2023 rather than purely volume-driven. As the inflationary cycle has moderated, that distinction has become uncomfortably relevant.

Gross margins have compressed modestly, from 55.1% in 2019 to 54.2% in 2023, reflecting input cost pressures that the company has largely—but not entirely—passed through to consumers. Operating margins have declined more noticeably, from 13.9% in 2019 to 12.5% in 2023, suggesting that selling, general, and administrative expenses have grown faster than revenue. When a company’s topline grows but its operating margin contracts, the incremental revenue is being consumed by cost rather than flowing to the bottom line. This is a trend that warrants scrutiny.

Five-Year Financial Trajectory

Metric	2019	2020	2021	2022	2023
Revenue ($B)	$67.2	$70.4	$79.5	$86.4	$91.5
Gross Margin	55.1%	54.8%	53.3%	53.0%	54.2%
Operating Margin	13.9%	12.9%	12.4%	12.4%	12.5%
Net Margin	10.9%	10.2%	9.7%	10.4%	10.0%
EBIT/Interest	10.0x	8.0x	5.3x	11.4x	13.9x
Debt/Equity	4.3x	5.9x	4.8x	4.4x	4.4x

Source: MMCG database, PepsiCo SEC filings (FY2019–FY2023). Revenue rounded to nearest $0.1B.

The balance sheet reflects the capital-intensive, acquisition-driven strategy that has defined the company for decades. Total assets reached $100.5 billion in 2023. The current ratio stands at 0.9x. The debt-to-equity ratio of 4.4x has improved from 5.9x in 2020. The EBIT-to-interest coverage ratio of 13.9x is robust, and EBITDA-to-interest of 25.2x provides a substantial cushion. PepsiCo’s investment-grade credit rating of A-73 remains well-supported by current cash flows.

IV. THE NINE INDUSTRIES

A Multi-Front Competitive Assessment

What distinguishes PepsiCo from most of its peers—and what makes it a uniquely complex credit and tenancy analysis—is its simultaneous participation across multiple, structurally different industries. The MMCG database tracks PepsiCo’s competitive position across nine U.S. industries. The picture that emerges is one of dominant strength in core categories, missed opportunities in high-growth verticals, and a persistent productivity deficit that cuts across every segment.

Soda Production: The Anchor Franchise

PepsiCo commands a 39.5% share of the $46.2 billion U.S. Soda Production industry—the highest of any operator. Estimated segment revenue of $18.3 billion makes this the company’s most significant business line, and the MMCG competitive matrix classifies it as an “All Star.” Its nearest competitor, Keurig Dr Pepper, holds 21.7%.

But there are cautionary signals. PepsiCo’s soda market share has decreased by 3.9 percentage points since 2021—the largest share erosion of any of its industry positions. Its profit margin in this segment, at 9%, ranks third of four tracked competitors. Most strikingly, Dr Pepper overtook the Pepsi brand in 2024 to become the number-two CSD in America, a symbolic setback that underscores the structural headwinds facing PepsiCo’s namesake franchise.

Snack Food Production: The Margin Engine

If Soda is PepsiCo’s largest revenue contributor, Snack Food is its most profitable—and arguably its most strategically important. The company holds a 31.2% share of the $46.1 billion U.S. snack food industry, generating an estimated $14.4 billion in revenue with a 24% profit margin, the highest among all six tracked competitors. Frito-Lay’s dominant position—roughly 60% or more of the U.S. salty snack market—with industry-leading operating margins of approximately 30% and an unmatched direct-store-delivery network, constitutes PepsiCo’s most formidable competitive moat.

The December 2025 completion of Mars’s $35.9 billion acquisition of Kellanova, however, created the world’s largest snacking company with approximately $36 billion in combined snacking revenue. For the first time in decades, Frito-Lay faces a competitor with comparable scale—and Mars’s private ownership enables long-term strategic patience without quarterly earnings pressure.

The Growth Stories: Bottled Water and Pre-Made Salsa

PepsiCo holds a 22.0% share of the $10.1 billion bottled water market, with revenue growing at an annualized 5.2% since 2021—outperforming the industry average. The company’s 37.1% share of Pre-Made Salsa Production, driven by Tostitos, generates the highest profit margin of any PepsiCo segment at 27%. These are quietly resilient contributors that merit more investor attention than they typically receive.

The Missed Opportunities: Energy, RTD Coffee, and Cereal

Energy drinks represent one of the most dynamic beverage categories, with the $23.9 billion U.S. industry growing at 14.1% annually. PepsiCo’s Rockstar brand gives it just 4.7% market share—a distant third behind Monster Beverage and Red Bull. In RTD Coffee, the company holds 26.0% share but has lost 5 percentage points since 2021 even as the industry grew at 13.2%. And PepsiCo’s Quaker cereals business—at 5.0% share and declining at 3.1% annually—is the only segment in outright revenue contraction.

Consolidated Market Position Summary

Industry	Share	Revenue	Margin	Trend	Classification
Soda Production	39.5%	$18.3B	9%	↓ −3.9pp	All Star
Pre-Made Salsa	37.1%	$357M	27%	↑ +4.2pp	Rising Star
Snack Food	31.2%	$14.4B	24%	↑ +0.1pp	All Star
RTD Coffee	26.0%	$1.4B	12%	↓ −5.0pp	Disruptor
Bottled Water	22.0%	$2.1B	14%	↑ +0.8pp	Disruptor
Syrup & Flavoring	18.0%	—	—	↑ Increasing	Rising Star
Cereal	5.0%	$620M	11%	↓ −1.3pp	Rising Star
Energy Drinks	4.7%	$1.1B	10%	↓ −2.0pp	Rising Star

Source: MMCG database. Market share data as of 2025–2026 depending on industry reporting period.

V. THE COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

Nine Rivals, One Question: Can PepsiCo Defend Its Empire?

PepsiCo’s competitive universe is broader than any single rival’s, spanning carbonated soft drinks, sports drinks, energy drinks, salty snacks, cereals, and functional beverages. Understanding who is gaining ground—and where—is essential to any informed assessment of PepsiCo’s forward trajectory.

Coca-Cola: The Defining Rivalry

The Coca-Cola Company remains PepsiCo’s most consequential competitor, generating $47.1 billion in FY2024 revenue with a market capitalization of approximately $340 billion. Coca-Cola commands roughly 43.7% of the global CSD market versus PepsiCo’s 25.9%. Its asset-light franchise bottling model delivers operating margins of approximately 30%—roughly double PepsiCo’s. Coca-Cola’s FY2024 execution was notably stronger, delivering 12% organic revenue growth versus PepsiCo’s approximately 2%. PepsiCo’s structural advantage lies elsewhere: Frito-Lay generates over $24 billion annually, providing a revenue base and profit stream Coca-Cola simply cannot match.

Keurig Dr Pepper: The Insurgent

Keurig Dr Pepper, at $15.35 billion in FY2024 revenue, achieved a landmark competitive milestone when Dr Pepper overtook Pepsi as the number-two CSD brand in America. Dr Pepper’s unique dual-distribution model—sold through both Coca-Cola and PepsiCo bottler networks—gives it structural presence on virtually every soda fountain and retail shelf. KDP’s bid of approximately $18 billion for JDE Peet’s signals major international ambitions, and its acquisition of GHOST Energy positions it aggressively in the fastest-growing beverage category.

Mondelēz, Mars-Kellanova, and the Snacking Wars

Mondelēz International ($36.4 billion FY2024 revenue) is the most direct competitor to Frito-Lay in the broader snacking arena, though the competition is more complementary than head-to-head—PepsiCo dominates salty snacks while Mondelēz dominates sweet snacks and chocolate. The more significant structural threat is the newly created Mars-Kellanova entity, commanding approximately $36 billion in combined snacking revenue with nine billion-dollar brands. This is the most consequential consolidation in PepsiCo’s competitive landscape in years.

Monster Beverage and the Energy Question

Monster Beverage ($7.49 billion FY2024 revenue, remarkable $80 billion market capitalization) commands approximately 30% of the U.S. energy drink market. Its distribution partnership with Coca-Cola provides global reach that PepsiCo’s Rockstar brand could not match. PepsiCo’s pivot to Celsius—selling Rockstar’s domestic operations and deepening its equity stake—is an implicit acknowledgment that its organic energy strategy failed.

Key Competitor Profiles

Competitor	FY2024 Rev.	Market Cap	Primary PepsiCo Overlap
Coca-Cola	$47.1B	~$340B	CSDs, sports drinks, water, energy
Nestlé	~$101.5B	~$267B	Water, coffee, breakfast
Mondelēz	$36.4B	~$75B	Snacking occasions, snack bars
Keurig Dr Pepper	$15.35B	~$37B	CSDs (#2 brand), coffee, energy
Monster Beverage	$7.49B	~$80B	Energy drinks
General Mills	$19.86B	~$25.5B	Cereals, snack bars
Mars/Kellanova	$12.75B*	Acq. $35.9B	Salty snacks at scale (Pringles, Cheez-It)
Campbell’s	$9.64B	~$9.0B	Premium salty snacks
Conagra	$12.05B	~$8.5B	Niche salty snacks, meat snacks

Source: MMCG database, public filings, market data. *Kellanova standalone revenue prior to Mars acquisition.

VI. THE PRODUCTIVITY PARADOX

Why the Largest Player Is the Least Efficient

Perhaps the most striking finding across our multi-industry analysis is PepsiCo’s consistently low revenue-per-employee metric. In Snack Food Production, its revenue per employee of $45,219 trails the industry average of $660,176. In Soda Production, $57,397 compares to an industry average of $621,800. In Bottled Water, $6,747 against a $544,455 industry norm. The pattern is unmistakable and industry-agnostic.

This is not necessarily an indictment of PepsiCo’s management. The company’s vertically integrated model—owning manufacturing, distribution, and route-to-market operations—requires a labor force that competitors relying on third-party distribution do not maintain. Monster Beverage, for example, outsources its manufacturing entirely, resulting in extraordinarily high revenue per employee but a fundamentally different business model.

Nonetheless, the productivity gap represents a strategic vulnerability. In an environment of rising labor costs, the company’s labor-intensive model creates margin pressure that asset-light competitors do not face. The Elliott Management agreement’s commitment to closing three Frito-Lay plants, reducing SKUs by approximately 20%, and delivering at least 100 basis points of core operating margin expansion over three years represents the most concrete acknowledgment of this problem in the company’s recent history.

Elliott Management’s intervention has catalyzed meaningful operational reform—SKU rationalization, plant closures, price reinvestment, and margin targets—but execution risk remains material.

VII. THE REAL ESTATE FOOTPRINT

868 Locations, 116 Million Square Feet, and One Critical Question

PepsiCo’s physical footprint is one of the largest of any consumer goods company in the world. The MMCG database identifies 868 distinct locations encompassing approximately 116 million square feet. The overwhelming majority—96%—is classified as industrial use, reflecting the company’s manufacturing-and-distribution-heavy operating model.

For commercial property investors and lenders, PepsiCo’s investment-grade credit rating makes it one of the most creditworthy industrial tenants in the United States. Facilities leased to PepsiCo are typically mission-critical manufacturing plants, distribution centers, and warehouse operations—long-duration, operationally embedded tenancies that provide landlords with stable, predictable cash flows.

The critical question for real estate underwriters is not whether PepsiCo is a creditworthy tenant—it manifestly is—but how the company’s evolving product mix and manufacturing strategy might affect individual facility utilization over time. A plant dedicated to cereal production faces a fundamentally different demand trajectory than a snack food or bottled water facility. The Elliott-driven plant closures add specificity to this concern: three Frito-Lay facilities are slated for closure, meaning even PepsiCo’s strongest segment is not immune to rationalization. Property-level analysis—rather than sole reliance on the corporate credit—is the appropriate approach.

VIII. THE VERDICT

Constructive, but Watchful

PepsiCo’s 60-year journey from a $510 million Pepsi-Cola/Frito-Lay merger to a $92 billion, 23-brand empire represents one of consumer packaged goods’ most successful diversification stories. The company’s willingness to make bold portfolio moves—entering and exiting restaurants, consolidating bottling, and now pivoting aggressively toward health-oriented brands like Poppi, Siete, and Celsius—demonstrates strategic adaptability that few enterprises of comparable scale can match.

For lenders evaluating PepsiCo as a counterparty or tenant, the risk is not near-term default—the probability of which remains exceedingly low—but rather the long-term trajectory of the business. The persistent productivity gap, declining market share in several growth categories, operating margin compression, and the structural challenges facing its cereal and, increasingly, its soda businesses represent headwinds that could gradually erode the company’s credit profile if left unaddressed.

The Snack Food and Pre-Made Salsa segments provide the company’s clearest sources of competitive advantage and margin resilience. The Bottled Water business shows encouraging growth momentum. The Energy Drink and RTD Coffee categories represent optionality—if PepsiCo can accelerate growth in these high-potential segments, the overall portfolio narrative improves materially.

The competitive landscape is simultaneously fragmenting—energy drinks, functional beverages, prebiotic sodas—and consolidating, as the Mars-Kellanova and KDP-JDE Peet’s transactions reshape the industry. PepsiCo’s strategic response—acquiring growth brands, investing in Celsius rather than building organically in energy, and cutting prices to defend volume—suggests management recognizes that the pricing-led growth model of 2022–2023 has reached its limits.

Our recommendation is to maintain a constructive but watchful posture. PepsiCo’s Dividend King status, $7+ billion annual free cash flow, unrivaled snack-beverage portfolio, and 868-location real estate footprint provide a substantial margin of safety. But the direction of travel on margins, market share, and productivity merits ongoing surveillance. The next twelve months—as management executes on the Elliott agreement, integrates Poppi and Siete, and navigates a consumer environment that has grown unforgiving of premium pricing without premium value—will determine whether PepsiCo’s current inflection point becomes a turning point or a tipping point.

February 23, 2026 by Michal Mohelsky, principal of MMCG Invest, LLC, USDA Feasibility Study Company

Sources:

PepsiCo, Inc. "Annual Report on Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended December 28, 2024." U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

PepsiCo, Inc. "Q4 2024 Earnings Press Release (Exhibit 99.1)." U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

PepsiCo, Inc. "Q4 2024 Prepared Management Remarks." PepsiCo Investor Relations.

PepsiCo, Inc. "2024 Annual Report to Shareholders." U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Coca-Cola Company. "Coca-Cola Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2024 Results." Coca-Cola Investor Relations, February 2025.

Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. "Keurig Dr Pepper Reports Q4 and Full Year 2024 Results and Provides 2025 Outlook." PR Newswire, February 2025.

Monster Beverage Corporation. "Monster Beverage Reports 2024 Fourth Quarter and Full Year Financial Results." GlobeNewsWire, February 27, 2025.

Nestlé S.A. "Full Year Results 2024." Nestlé Media/Investors, February 2025.

Mondelēz International. "Mondelēz International Reports FY24 Financial Results and Provides FY25 Outlook." Nasdaq, 2025.

PepsiCo, Inc. "PepsiCo Announces Priorities to Enhance Shareholder Value and Provides Preliminary 2026 Outlook." PepsiCo Newsroom, December 2025.

PepsiCo, Inc. "PepsiCo Completes Acquisition of Poppi, Accelerating Strategic Portfolio Transformation." PepsiCo Newsroom, 2025

PepsiCo, Inc. "PepsiCo Refines Sustainability Goals to Position Business for the Long Term." PepsiCo Newsroom, 2025.

PepsiCo, Inc. "PepsiCo Elects CEO Ramon Laguarta as Chairman of the Board." PepsiCo Newsroom, 2019.

PepsiCo, Inc. "PepsiCo Completes Transformative Bottling Acquisitions." PR Newswire, 2010.

"PepsiCo Full 2024 Earnings: EPS and Revenue Results." Yahoo Finance, 2025.

"PepsiCo Plans Layoffs, Looks to Wrap Up Restructuring." Yahoo Finance, 2025.

"PepsiCo Q4 2024 Earnings." CNBC, February 4, 2025.

"Activist Elliott Builds $4 Billion Stake in PepsiCo." Bloomberg, September 2, 2025.

"Pepsi, Activist Elliott, $4 Billion Shareholder — Cut Product Mix 20 Percent." Fortune, December 8, 2025.

"Dr Pepper Overtakes Pepsi as No. 2 Soda." CNN Business, June 3, 2024.

"PepsiCo Seeks to Reignite Snack Sales." Food Business News, 2025.

"PepsiCo Elects Laguarta Chairman." Food Business News.

"Activist Takes $4B Stake in PepsiCo Amid Push to Turnaround CPG Giant." Food Dive, 2025.

"Mars to Close $36B Kellanova Acquisition on Dec. 11 After Receiving EU Approval." Food Dive, 2025.

"PepsiCo Ups Stake in Energy Drink Company Celsius with $585M Deal." Food Dive, 2025.

"PepsiCo Cuts Snack Prices, Bets on Siete, Poppi, Celsius." Bakery and Snacks, February 4, 2026.

"PepsiCo–Elliott Restructuring: SKU Cuts." Food Ingredients First, 2025.

"PepsiCo Closes Frito-Lay Plants U.S." Food Ingredients First, 2026.

"Nestlé Water Unit Sale — Perrier." Food Ingredients First, 2025.

"Gatorade, Powerade, BODYARMOR: How Coca-Cola and PepsiCo Shape Sports Drinks." Beverage Daily, February 26, 2025.

"Campbell's to Acquire Sovos Brands." The Shelby Report, March 13, 2024.

"General Mills Shares Sink 7% on Slashed 2026 Outlook and Weak Consumer Sentiment." Market Minute via Financial Content, February 18, 2026.

"Nestlé Reports FY 2024 Sales of CHF 91.4 Billion." Comunicaffè, 2025.

"United States Energy Drink Market Forecast Report 2025–2033." BusinessWire / ResearchAndMarkets, 2025.

"Mondelēz International to Acquire Clif Bar & Company." Mondelēz International Investor Relations.

CompaniesMarketCap. "PepsiCo Market Cap."

CompaniesMarketCap. "Coca-Cola Market Cap."

CompaniesMarketCap. "Keurig Dr Pepper Market Cap."

CompaniesMarketCap. "Monster Beverage Market Cap."

CompaniesMarketCap. "Mondelēz Revenue."

CompaniesMarketCap. "Nestlé Revenue."

CompaniesMarketCap. "Conagra Brands Market Cap."

Macrotrends. "Campbell's Market Cap."

Macrotrends. "Keurig Dr Pepper Revenue."

Macrotrends. "Mondelēz Market Cap."

Macrotrends. "Monster Beverage Market Cap."

Macrotrends. "Nestlé S.A. Market Cap."

Mergr. "PepsiCo Acquisitions."

Statista. "PepsiCo — Statistics & Facts."

Statista. "Net Sales of General Mills Worldwide."

Statista. "Net Sales of Conagra Foods Worldwide."

Statista. "Market Share of Leading Energy Drink Brands in the U.S."

Historical & Reference Sources

"Pepsi-Cola." NCpedia (North Carolina Encyclopedia).

"PepsiCo." Encyclopedia Britannica — Britannica Money.

"PepsiCo." Wikipedia.

"Indra Nooyi." Wikipedia.

"PepsiCo — History." The Pepsi Store, New Bern, NC.

"PepsiCo — Careers & History." Zippia.

"Brief History of PepsiCo." Porter's Five Forces Analysis.

"PepsiCo's Strategic Mergers and Acquisitions Evolution." M&A Equilibrium.

"PepsiCo Acquisitions — Detailed History." Calcbench Blog.

"PepsiCo — Research Starter." EBSCO.

Supplemental Data Points

Voronoi. "While Pepsi Revenue Pops, Dr Pepper Is Bubbling Up in the Soda Standings."

Bullfincher. "PepsiCo Revenue by Geography."

Bullfincher. "Monster Beverage Corporation Market Cap."

PitchBook. "PepsiCo Company Profile."

PepsiCo, Inc. "2024 Proxy Statement (DEF 14A)." U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

PepsiCo, Inc. "Q1–Q3 2025 Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q." U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

PepsiCo, Inc. "ESG / Sustainability Report 2024." PepsiCo Corporate.

PepsiCo, Inc. "CDP Climate Change Response 2024." CDP.

The Coca-Cola Company. "2024 Form 10-K." U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. SEC EDGAR CIK: 0000021344.

Mondelēz International, Inc. "2024 Form 10-K." U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. SEC EDGAR CIK: 0001103982.

Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. "2024 Form 10-K." U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. SEC EDGAR CIK: 0001418135.

General Mills, Inc. "2024 Form 10-K." U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. SEC EDGAR CIK: 0000040704.

Conagra Brands, Inc. "2024 Form 10-K." U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. SEC EDGAR CIK: 0000023217.

The Campbell's Company. "2024 Form 10-K." U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. SEC EDGAR CIK: 0000016732.

Monster Beverage Corporation. "2024 Form 10-K." U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. SEC EDGAR CIK: 0000865752.

IBISWorld. "Soda Production in the US (31211a)." IBISWorld Industry Reports, 2025.

Euromonitor International. "Soft Drinks in the US — Country Report." Passport Database, 2025.

Euromonitor International. "Savoury Snacks in the US — Country Report." Passport Database, 2025.

CBRE. "U.S. Food & Beverage MarketView." CBRE Research, 2025.

Mordor Intelligence. "U.S. Carbonated Soft Drinks Market — Growth, Trends, and Forecast (2025–2030)."

Grand View Research. "Energy Drinks Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report, 2025–2030."

S&P Capital IQ. PepsiCo Inc. (PEP) — Financial Summary, Segment Data, Peer Comparison.

Bloomberg Terminal. PEP US Equity — FA (Financial Analysis), SPLC (Supply Chain), COMP (Comparable Analysis).

FactSet. PepsiCo, Inc. — Estimates, Ownership, Supply Chain Analytics.

Refinitiv Eikon / LSEG Workspace. PEP.N — Financial Summary, Deals, ESG Scores.

Pitchbook. PepsiCo M&A Transaction History and Comps.

Nielsen IQ / Circana (IRI). U.S. Salty Snack Category Scanner Data; U.S. CSD Category Scanner Data.

STR (CoStar Group). Beverage and Snack Adjacency — Convenience Retail & Foodservice Channel Data.

Harvard Business School. "PepsiCo's Diversification Strategy Through Acquisitions." Case Study Collection.

Kellogg School of Management. "Indra Nooyi at PepsiCo: Performance with Purpose." Case Study.

ULI / PwC. "Emerging Trends in Real Estate 2025." (Referenced for CPG real estate footprint analysis.)

Elliott Investment Management L.P. "Letter to PepsiCo Board of Directors." September 2025. (Referenced via Bloomberg, Fortune, Food Dive coverage.)

Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS). PepsiCo, Inc. — Proxy Analysis and Governance QuickScore.

Glass Lewis. PepsiCo, Inc. — 2025 Proxy Paper.