Ross Dress for Less: America’s No-Frills Retail Treasure Hunt

Ross Dress for Less has built a quiet empire of bargain-packed stores across the United States. On any given weekend morning, its stores brim with thrifty shoppers rifling through racks of designer-label blouses and budget-friendly home décor. With fluorescent lighting and minimal decor, a Ross store is a far cry from a glossy department store – yet this unassuming chain has become a powerhouse in American retail by giving consumers exactly what its name promises: a chance to “dress for less.”

Corporate Scope and Positioning

Ross Dress for Less is the flagship division of Ross Stores, Inc., a California-based retail company that also operates the smaller dd’s Discounts chain. As a standalone business unit, Ross Dress for Less encompasses the company’s core off-price apparel and home fashion stores. It has evolved into one of the nation’s largest off-price retailers, focusing on selling brand-name clothing and home goods at steep discounts. In the cutthroat landscape of discount retail, Ross occupies a unique niche: it’s not a traditional department store, nor a big-box supercenter, but an off-price apparel and home fashion retailer offering a “treasure hunt” shopping experience. This positioning has proven resilient – especially during economic downturns – as cost-conscious consumers flock to Ross for deals on everything from Calvin Klein dresses to kitchenware.

Measured by revenue, Ross Dress for Less is a leader in the discount department store segment, holding roughly one-fifth of that market. In industry terms, “discount department stores” include off-price chains and general merchandisers that sell a wide range of goods at lower prices. Ross’s approximately 20% share of this segment’s revenue places it among the top three U.S. players, alongside only the much larger Walmart and TJX Companies (owner of T.J. Maxx and Marshalls). This is a remarkable standing for a retailer that, unlike Walmart, confines itself largely to apparel and home furnishings. It speaks to Ross’s role as a formidable competitor to TJX in the off-price arena. TJX’s U.S. chains still command a larger share (over 40% of the discount department store market), but Ross has steadily closed the gap by expanding its store base and attracting value-oriented shoppers away from mid-tier department stores. In the related category of family clothing retail, Ross is also a heavyweight – accounting for just over 6% of U.S. family apparel store sales, second only to TJX in that category. This dual presence underscores Ross’s hybrid identity: it straddles the line between a multi-department discounter and a specialized apparel retailer.

Ross’s strategy and branding emphasize no-frills value. The stores themselves are utilitarian – simple racks, bargain-basement fixtures, and products often grouped by size rather than elaborate displays – all to minimize operating costs. Unlike traditional department stores, there are no commissioned salespeople or luxurious dressing rooms. This lean approach helps Ross pass savings onto customers in the form of lower prices. The company’s long-time slogan, “Dress for Less,” encapsulates its promise: name-brand fashion at 20–60% off regular retail prices. That proposition has positioned Ross as a go-to destination for middle- and lower-income shoppers, as well as bargain hunters from all walks of life. In the competitive matrix, Ross is often compared to T.J. Maxx/Marshalls, and indeed their models are similar – but Ross distinguishes itself by generally eschewing e-commerce (it has no online store, whereas TJX has a limited online presence) and by focusing on a slightly lower price-point on average. This means Ross stores tend to stock more deeply discounted goods and might have less of the luxury designer labels that one occasionally finds at a T.J. Maxx. The result is a treasure-hunt shopping experience engineered for thrill-of-the-find value: shoppers know that if they don’t grab that $19.99 dress or $29.99 name-brand handbag now, it might be gone tomorrow. In an era when many retailers chase online growth or experiential retail, Ross’s old-school focus on brick-and-mortar bargains has proven to be a quietly powerful positioning, keeping it competitive against both its off-price peers and the faltering traditional department stores.

Real Estate Footprint

From California strip malls to Southern suburbia, Ross has planted its flag across much of the country with a vast brick-and-mortar footprint. As of mid-decade, Ross Stores, Inc. (including dd’s Discounts) operates roughly 2,200 locations in the United States. The Ross Dress for Less brand comprises the majority of these stores, which are spread over dozens of states. This coast-to-coast expansion has been deliberate – following population growth and retail development trends – and today you’ll find Ross stores in high-traffic retail corridors of California, Texas, Florida, and other populous states. California alone hosts over three hundred Ross stores (its single biggest market), and other states like Texas and Florida each count a few hundred as well. In general, the chain’s geographic distribution mirrors the U.S. population, with heavy concentrations in the South, West, and Mid-Atlantic regions where large consumer markets reside. Notably, Ross initially had a lighter presence in the Northeast, but in recent years it has been pushing into new territories and smaller markets, signaling an appetite to continue filling gaps in its U.S. map.

All told, Ross occupies approximately 72 million square feet of real estate nationwide. About four-fifths of that footprint is dedicated to its retail stores, while the remainder consists of logistics and corporate space. In other words, roughly 79% of Ross’s real estate is retail storefronts – the sales floors and backrooms where customers peruse and purchases are made. The remaining ~21% is primarily made up of distribution centers and a smattering of office facilities, including Ross’s headquarters in Dublin, California. Ross’s supply chain relies on a network of large regional distribution centers that receive truckloads of goods (often opportunistic buys from manufacturers or department store overruns) and then allocate this merchandise out to stores. These logistics hubs are crucial for the fast turnarounds and constantly refreshed inventory that keep Ross’s stores stocked with new bargains each week. They represent a significant, if behind-the-scenes, portion of Ross’s real estate footprint and capital investment. The typical Ross store itself is a single-level, spacious box of around 25,000 square feet, usually with a plain storefront bearing the familiar blue “ROSS DRESS FOR LESS” signage. The chain favors locations in open-air shopping centers and strip malls rather than enclosed high-end malls. It’s common to find Ross as an anchor (or co-anchor) tenant in suburban power centers, often alongside grocery stores, dollar stores, or other value-focused retailers. This preference reflects Ross’s strategic targeting of cost-effective retail sites: rents tend to be lower in these strip centers than in upscale malls, and parking is ample for shoppers who often buy in bulk or large items.

Ross’s real estate approach is notably asset-light. The company leases virtually all of its store locations, rather than owning the properties – a strategy that grants flexibility and keeps capital expenditures lower. (In fact, Ross has disclosed that it owned only a handful of stores outright, with the rest under lease agreements.) Leasing means Ross can enter and exit sites more nimbly as markets change, and it avoids tying up huge sums in real estate; however, it also means exposure to rent escalations over time. The stores themselves tend to be freestanding or part of strip mall clusters, with simple layouts that need only modest tenant improvement when a new store opens. Many Ross locations are in somewhat lower-rent, suburban areas as opposed to prime downtown retail districts – consistent with serving a budget-conscious clientele and keeping overhead low. This site profile stands in contrast to, say, a flashy urban flaghip store that some retailers pursue; Ross has made a virtue of being “where the people are” in everyday shopping centers. A Saturday morning trip to Ross might involve pulling into a large parking lot off a commercial highway, walking past neighboring big boxes like a Target or HomeGoods, and entering a no-frills store that’s packed with merchandise but light on glamour. This real estate strategy – prolific, suburban, and pragmatic – has enabled Ross to expand profitably. Even as many retailers have slowed store openings, Ross continues to add new locations each year. In 2025, for instance, the company announced plans to open around 90 new stores(including new Ross Dress for Less sites) over the course of the year, leveraging available retail space vacated by struggling competitors and extending its reach into both new and existing markets.

NAICS Classification and Retail Segments

Ross Dress for Less sits at the crossroads of several NAICS retail categories, reflecting its blended identity as both an apparel retailer and a broad discount store. Under the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS), Ross is most often associated with Discount Department Stores (NAICS 452210). This category encompasses retailers that sell a wide range of merchandise – from clothing to housewares – at lower than traditional prices. Ross fits this bill because its stores carry a variety of product departments (women’s, men’s, kids’ apparel, footwear, home décor, accessories, etc.), much like a scaled-down department store, and it competes on price. In the Discount Department Stores industry, Ross is identified as a major player and something of a “rising star,” with strong profit and revenue growth relative to peers. It’s important to note that NAICS distinguishes discount department stores from traditional full-line department stores; Ross doesn’t offer the full assortment a Macy’s or Nordstrom does (for example, it has no fine jewelry counters, no large appliances, no cosmetics beauty counter with clerks), but by NAICS definitions it’s grouped with other high-volume discounters. Industry analysts estimate Ross accounts for about 20% of the U.S. discount department store industry’s revenue, underscoring its significant role in that segment.

At the same time, Ross squarely falls under Family Clothing Stores (NAICS 448140), a retail classification for establishments that stock apparel for men, women, and children without a single specialized focus. Essentially, if a store sells clothing for the whole family under one roof, NAICS deems it a family clothing store – a category that includes mall staples like Gap, Old Navy, or Kohl’s, but also off-price chains like Ross. Indeed, Ross Stores, Inc. holds on the order of 6–7% of the U.S. family clothing store market by revenue, making it one of the top two or three players in that apparel-focused arena. In practice, what this means is that a substantial chunk of Ross’s business is in apparel (as opposed to groceries or electronics), directly competing with specialty clothing retailers. Ross’s identity as a family clothing retailer is evident every time you walk in: the first thing greeting shoppers is often racks of women’s dresses or blouses, followed by men’s and kids’ sections further back. Unlike a pure apparel specialty store, though, Ross differentiates itself by the depth of its discounts and the opportunistic, ever-changing assortment. This puts it in a different strategic bucket even if NAICS overlaps.

Adding a layer of complexity, the latest NAICS updates (2022) introduced a broader category – Clothing and Clothing Accessory Retailers (NAICS 458110) – which essentially groups all clothing-focused retail (excluding department stores) into one umbrella. Under this updated scheme, traditional family clothing stores and other apparel shops are combined. Ross, by virtue of its huge apparel sales, is naturally a part of this broad clothing retail industry as well. In fact, Ross is notable enough to rank among the top companies in the overall clothing and accessories retail category: it commands roughly 5% of that entire market, on par with or ahead of iconic apparel players like Gap Inc. This reflects how large Ross has become in selling clothing. The distinctions between these segments can be subtle but important. Discount Department Stores (452210) is about the format – stores that sell a mix of goods at discounts (Ross, Burlington, Walmart’s general merchandise, etc.). Family Clothing Stores (448140) is about the merchandise focus – apparel for all ages (whether sold at full price or discount). Clothing and Accessory Retailers (458110) is an even broader grouping acknowledging that today’s clothing retailers often blur lines (including e-commerce and big chains). Ross manages to straddle all three definitions. It competes with general merchandisers on price and variety, and with apparel specialistson fashion and assortment. As a result, analysts studying Ross might place it in one bucket or another. For instance, one could compare Ross’s performance to Kohl’s or JCPenney (as fellow discount-oriented department stores) or compare it to Gap and TJX (as fellow apparel chains) – both perspectives are valid. In sum, Ross Dress for Less is a chameleon in retail classification: officially a discount department store by NAICS code, fundamentally a family apparel retailer in product mix, and broadly one of America’s largest clothing sellers by any measure. This multifaceted position underscores Ross’s versatility in the retail market – it’s able to siphon customers equally from someone who might otherwise shop at Macy’s for a dress or Target for kids’ clothes.

Product Assortment and Customer Mix

Walk into a Ross Dress for Less, and you’ll find a little bit of everything – but the heart of Ross’s assortment is apparel. Clothing racks dominate the floor space, reflecting the company’s core focus on outfitting the entire family. Industry data show that for family clothing retailers, women’s apparel tends to be the largest revenue driver (around 40% of sales on average), followed by men’s apparel (roughly 25–30%). Ross aligns with this pattern. Its stores are especially known for a sizable women’s department: dresses, tops, activewear, and seasonal fashions for women are typically front and center, often comprising the single biggest slice of sales. A shopper can find everything from career-wear blazers to casual jeans on the women’s racks, all at prices significantly lower than standard retail. The men’s clothing section is also robust – offering discount polos, athletic wear, denim, and occasional designer pieces – though men’s apparel generally makes up a smaller share of sales than women’s at Ross, consistent with broader apparel retail trends. For children, Ross provides a range of kids’ and baby clothing, from playtime basics to cute outfit sets, which collectively constitute roughly a tenth of the merchandise mix in a typical store. This emphasis on kids’ clothing, though modest compared to adult apparel, is crucial to Ross’s value proposition as a one-stop family outfitter; many Ross trips are by moms and dads looking to clothe growing children on a budget.

Footwear and accessories round out Ross Dress for Less’s merchandise categories in significant ways. Aisles of shoeboxes are a staple of the Ross experience – shoppers commonly scour the footwear section for athletic sneakers, sandals, or dress shoes at cut-rate prices. Shoes can account for upwards of 10–15% of sales, an important contributor to the store’s appeal. In fact, the thrill of finding a pair of name-brand running shoes or fashion boots at half their usual price is a major draw for Ross’s customer base. Accessories – which include items like handbags, wallets, belts, and jewelry – typically make up a single-digit percentage of sales, but they add high-margin impulse buys to Ross’s revenue mix. A shopper coming for a blouse might easily throw a new purse or a pair of sunglasses into the cart if the price is right. These categories not only boost the average basket size but also reinforce Ross’s image as a head-to-toe outfitting destination. The store layout often intermingles accessories near checkout, tempting customers with last-minute grabs. And beyond fashion, Ross also carries a rotating selection of home furnishings, décor, and seasonal items (from throw pillows to bathroom soaps) – a legacy of its off-price buying strategy that says no category is off-limits if it’s a bargain. While home goods are not apparel, they are strategically stocked to encourage apparel shoppers to spend a few extra minutes (and dollars) in the store hunting for household deals. This multi-category assortment increases the treasure-hunt atmosphere: one never knows if today’s visit will yield a great new skillet for the kitchen along with that pair of jeans.

Ross’s merchandise mix heavily shapes its customer demographics and brand positioning. By specializing in discounted casual and basic fashion for women, men, and kids, Ross predominantly attracts value-conscious female shoppers, often mothers or working women managing a family budget. Retail analysts note that women are the primary shoppers in the off-price apparel segment, and Ross is no exception. Its emphasis on women’s apparel and the abundance of bargains in ladies’ footwear and accessories naturally appeal to women looking to maximize style for their dollar. These core customers often span working-class to middle-class households, including many young families, who may find Ross an affordable alternative to department stores for dressing the family. The significant children’s section means the chain is positioned as a family-friendly retailer – it’s the kind of place where a mom can pick up school clothes for the kids, a new workout outfit for herself, and even some home décor for the living room, all without breaking the bank. In this sense, Ross’s product assortment reinforces a brand image of practicality and inclusivity: it’s not targeting fashionistas or luxury seekers, but rather everyday people who need to stretch their paycheck. The broad mix of styles (from trendy juniors’ tops to plus-size dresses to menswear) also means Ross caters to a wide age range, from teenagers to seniors, further enlarging its customer base.

The merchandising strategy – constantly changing, bargain-heavy, and wide-assorted – cultivates a “treasure hunt” shopping mentality that is key to Ross’s brand positioning. Customers know that inventory at Ross is unpredictable; new items arrive frequently and quantities are limited. This creates a sense of urgency and excitement: one might find a high-end designer piece at a steep discount, but if you hesitate, it could be gone on your next visit. That thrill keeps shoppers coming back often, checking Ross as part of their regular shopping routine. It also engenders loyalty among bargain hunters who pride themselves on finding quality goods at rock-bottom prices. In turn, this loyal customer base – largely budget-conscious women and families – forms the bedrock of Ross’s business. They are less concerned with fancy stores or online ordering and more with price, convenience, and the joy of discovery. Ross’s marketing is relatively understated (certainly compared to flashy fashion retailers); instead, the in-store experience and word-of-mouth do the work. The result is a brand positioned as approachable and unpretentious. Shoppers don’t go to Ross for curated displays or personal shoppers – they go for the deal. And thanks to a finely tuned product mix that covers apparel basics and household whims alike, Ross manages to capture a large slice of America’s bargain-shopping enthusiasm.

Financial Performance and Outlook (2020–2030)

In financial terms, Ross Dress for Less has proven to be one of the retail sector’s steadier performers, navigating the turbulence of the 2020s with a value-driven formula. The early part of the decade, however, tested Ross as never before. Pandemic lockdowns in 2020 forced the temporary closure of all Ross stores in the spring of that year, causing a sharp sales decline. Annual revenues, which had been about $16.0 billion in 2019, fell significantly during the worst of COVID-19 disruptions – dropping to roughly $12.5 billion in fiscal 2020 (a year that included the spring 2020 shutdowns). Net income essentially evaporated that year as stores sat closed; Ross barely broke even, with a slim 0.7% profit margin in 2020. However, the chain staged an impressive rebound once stores reopened. Pent-up consumer demand and stimulus-fueled spending in 2021 led to a surge in off-price sales. Ross’s revenue bounced back to $18.9 billion in 2021 (fiscal year ending January 2022), comfortably exceeding pre-pandemic levels. Profits followed suit: the company earned over $1.7 billion in net income in 2021, restoring a healthy net margin around 9%. This whiplash – from near-zero profit in 2020 to robust profitability a year later – illustrated Ross’s fundamental strength: when consumers are in a pinch or seeking value, Ross wins business. The trend held as the recovery continued. In 2022, sales stayed roughly flat at $18.7 billion, and then grew to about $20.4 billion in 2023, marking a new sales peak for Ross Stores, Inc. By 2024, Ross’s revenue had climbed further to an estimated $20.4–20.5 billion, and net earnings that year were nearly $1.9 billion – roughly a 9.2% net profit margin, very close to its pre-pandemic profitability. Ross’s operating margin in 2024 stood around 12%, with an EBITDA margin in the mid-teens, reflecting the chain’s lean cost structure and improved sales leverage. These margins are particularly strong in retail: for comparison, the average net margin among family clothing retailers has been about 4–5%, making Ross’s profitability roughly double the industry norm. Even within the discount retail universe, where the average profit margin is around 6–7%, Ross outperforms many peers by keeping costs low and inventory turns high.

Looking ahead to the 2025–2030 forecast, Ross is cautiously optimistic yet faces a landscape of both opportunities and challenges. Industry projections suggest that the off-price and discount apparel sector will see modest growth in the latter half of the decade – on the order of 0% to 1% annually in inflation-adjusted terms, as the market is fairly mature. Nevertheless, Ross plans to drive growth by expanding its store base and increasing sales per store. With approximately 2,200 stores today, the company still sees room for more: it has publicly stated goals of eventually operating 2,400 or more Ross Dress for Less and dd’s Discounts stores combined in the U.S.. Achieving that would mean adding roughly 50–100 new stores each year, concentrated in underserved regions or densely populated areas that can support additional locations. If Ross executes on that expansion pace, by 2030 its store count could approach 2,700 locations. Alongside new stores, Ross will rely on moderate same-store sales growth (low single digits annually, in line with historical trends outside of economic shocks) to boost revenues. Taken together, these drivers could lift Ross’s annual revenue into the high-$20s billion by 2030 – perhaps in the neighborhood of $25–30 billion, assuming the economic environment remains stable. This represents a solid, if not explosive, growth trajectory from the ~$20 billion level mid-decade. It’s a rate consistent with an established retailer squeezing out incremental gains via new markets and increased market share, rather than via any radical transformation. Notably, Ross has thus far resisted the siren call of e-commerce, which many analysts see as both a risk and a potential upside if ever pursued. The company has argued that an online Ross model would be challenging (the treasure-hunt experience and low price points don’t translate easily to shipping individual orders), so for now growth is tied to physical retail performance.

Key operating metrics for Ross are expected to hold relatively steady through the forecast period. The chain’s productivity can be seen in measures like revenue per square foot, which currently stands around $290 per square foot per year (calculated from ~$21 billion in sales over ~72 million square feet of store space). This figure may inch up gradually if Ross can drive higher sales densities through merchandising and if weaker competitors exit some markets, leaving Ross with more customer traffic. By comparison, luxury retailers or tech-forward brands often have higher sales per square foot, but Ross’s ~$300/SF level is respectable for value-oriented big-box retail. It reflects the balance of relatively low prices but high inventory turnover that characterizes off-price retail. Another lens on productivity is revenue per employee – Ross employs about 108,000 people and generates roughly $195,000 in revenue per employee. That metric, too, is likely to grow modestly as the company continues to fine-tune labor efficiency in stores and distribution centers with technology and process improvements. However, off-price retail is labor-intensive by nature (frequent restocking, intensive store organization tasks, etc.), so we don’t expect a dramatic jump in sales-per-employee. In fact, industry observers often note that family clothing and off-price stores have lower revenue per employee than some retail sectors, given the hands-on work required; Ross is no exception, but it compensates by keeping labor costs relatively low (for instance, through lean staffing models and not over-investing in customer service frills).

When comparing Ross’s financial profile to its peers, a picture emerges of a highly efficient operator in the discount segment. Ross’s operating margins, in the low double-digits, are comparable to those of The TJX Companies (the off-price leader) and are significantly higher than margins at full-line department stores like Macy’s or Kohl’s, which often run in the mid-single-digits. Part of this advantage comes from Ross’s tight control of expenses – it spends very little on advertising and maintains a bare-bones store environment, whereas a department store may pour money into glossy marketing and store decor. Ross’s capital intensity is also relatively low. Because it leases stores and avoids the costly investments of e-commerce infrastructure, Ross’s capital expenditures are chiefly for opening new stores (basic fixtures and leasehold improvements) and upgrading distribution capacity. Its model doesn’t require expensive showroom stores or cutting-edge digital platforms – a contrast to many competitors. Even within discount retail, Ross tends to run a lean operation. For instance, its cost of goods is kept low by opportunistic buying and not having to commit to full-price seasonal inventory; its selling, general and administrative (SG&A) costs are pared down by no commissioned sales staff and modest corporate overhead. The result is an EBITDA margin that consistently lands in the mid-teens, outpacing most apparel retail peers. Ross’s return on assets and equity are also strong for retail, a sign that it makes good use of its leased real estate and inventory investment to generate profit. In short, Ross’s financial profile shows a company that squeezes a lot of profit out of each dollar of sales compared to many rivals. Investors often view it in the same favorable light as TJX – as a stalwart of the off-price space with dependable cash flows.

However, no outlook would be complete without considering macro-economic risk factors that could influence Ross’s fortunes through 2030. One significant wild card is the trade environment. Ross and other off-price retailers source a substantial portion of their merchandise from overseas manufacturing (directly or indirectly via the brands they buy). Changes in tariffs and trade policy can therefore hit the bottom line. Tariffs on imported goods – particularly from China – have the potential to raise Ross’s inventory costs materially. If tariffs were increased or expanded on apparel and home goods, Ross might face a tough choice: either absorb the higher costs and take a margin hit, or pass them onto customers in the form of price increases, which could weaken its value proposition. The last few years saw uncertainty on this front with U.S.–China trade tensions; while Ross navigated previous tariff hikes with minimal pricing changes (often vendors and off-price buyers find workarounds or new suppliers), the risk remains that a shift in trade policy could squeeze margins. Relatedly, supply chain disruptions pose another risk. The off-price model thrives on excess inventory in the supply chain – essentially, other retailers’ mis-orders or overstock become Ross’s treasure. But if global supply chains are in disarray (as they were in 2021’s freight bottlenecks), the flow of goods can be inconsistent.

Inflation is another double-edged sword for Ross Dress for Less. On one hand, high inflation in consumer goods (including apparel) drives shoppers downmarket in search of bargains. Indeed, during recent inflationary surges, many consumers grappling with rising living costs turned to discount retailers as havens for affordable essentials. Ross tends to benefit in such periods as people trading down from pricier stores discover they can stretch dollars further at off-price outlets. This dynamic was evident in 2022–2023 when inflation spiked; Ross saw solid sales as value-seeking behavior intensified. On the other hand, inflation also raises Ross’s own operating costs. Higher wages, higher fuel costs for freight, and more expensive materials all put pressure on the cost structure. Ross has had to implement selective price increases to offset rising costs for labor and logistics. The challenge is to do so without eroding the perception of deep discounts. If inflation remains persistently high, Ross’s margins could face pressure from increased expenses, even as the chain simultaneously gains customer traffic from inflation-hit households. It’s a careful balance to strike. Additionally, the broader economic cycle will influence Ross’s 2020s trajectory. A recession (always possible in a decade) could actually boost Ross’s customer appeal – as was seen in past downturns – but would also test the company’s ability to manage inventory and avoid markdowns if overall spending dips. Conversely, in boom times with low unemployment, Ross must compete harder for workers (raising wages) and for customers who have more disposable income to perhaps return to higher-end stores. The company has proven adept at weathering these macro swings by sticking to its mantra of value. As one industry observer noted, “economic downturns and inflation pushed budget-conscious consumers toward discount stores, which offered essential items at lower prices…making them appealing destinations during inflationary periods”. Ross’s playbook is essentially built for those exact scenarios.

In summary, Ross Dress for Less enters the second half of the decade as a financially strong retailer with a clear formula: grow steadily, manage costs diligently, and deliver bargains come what may. Its historical financials show resilience – a dip and dramatic recovery – and its forecast suggests sustainable, if moderate, growth. With a vast store network, a loyal customer base, and a focused off-price strategy, Ross is positioned to continue as a leader in discount retail. Ross’s story this decade is likely to be one of incremental expansion rather than radical reinvention – sticking to the fundamentals that have made it a retail mainstay. And if history is any guide, those fundamentals – low prices, wide assortment, and a bit of serendipity in every shopping trip – will keep bargain hunters streaming through Ross’s doors, rain or shine in the economy. In the grand narrative of American retail, Ross Dress for Less has carved out a successful chapter by embracing the simple premise that everyone loves a deal. It’s a strategy that has paid off handsomely so far, and odds are it will continue to do so through 2030.

December 28, 2025, by a collective of authors at MMCG Invest, LLC, a retail and SBA feasibility study company

Sources:

Ross Stores, Inc. Annual Report (Form 10‑K) for the fiscal year ended Feb. 1, 2025. Filed Apr. 1, 2025 (accepted Mar. 31, 2025). SEC EDGAR. Accessed Dec. 28, 2025.

2. Ross Stores, Inc. Form 10‑Q for the quarter ended Aug. 2, 2025. Filed Sept. 9, 2025. SEC EDGAR. Accessed Dec. 28, 2025.

3. Ross Stores, Inc. 2023 Corporate Social Responsibility Report. Published 2024. Accessed Dec. 28, 2025.

4. U.S. Census Bureau. NAICS Sector 44–45 (Retail Trade): archives/resources page. Accessed Dec. 28, 2025.

5. U.S. Census Bureau. NAICS 448140 (Family Clothing Stores) details page. Accessed Dec. 28, 2025.

6. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Handbook of Methods: CPI—Data Sources. Accessed Dec. 28, 2025.

7. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. CPI Entry Level Item Descriptions. Updated July 3, 2025. Accessed Dec. 28, 2025.

8. National Retail Federation. “NRF Says Holiday Season Was a Notable Success as ‘Consumers Came Out to Spend’.” Press release, Jan. 16, 2025. Accessed Dec. 28, 2025.

9. International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC). The Rise of the Gen Z Consumer. 2023. Accessed Dec. 28, 2025.

10. American Apparel & Footwear Association (AAFA). Fashion Tariffs 101. Accessed Dec. 28, 2025.