Refrigerated Storage Industry Analysis in the US, Current Market and Outlook
- MMCG
- May 21
- 34 min read
Executive Summary
The refrigerated storage sector plays a strategic role in the United States food and pharmaceutical supply chain, serving as the critical link that keeps perishable products safe from farm or factory to consumer. Major trends shaping this industry include surging demand for fresh and organic foods, the rise of e-commerce grocery fulfillment, and a strong push toward automation and energy efficiency in warehouses. These trends have translated into steady growth: industry revenues have risen to roughly $9 billion in 2025, reflecting a ~3.1% annual growth rate over the past five yearsfile-7661fn15owvaeskf94csc6. Going forward, growth is expected to moderate but remain positive – projections indicate ~1.8% annual revenue expansion through 2030, reaching about $9.9 billion by 2030. Overall, the outlook is optimistic: refrigerated storage is a relatively small (<2% of industrial real estate) yet vital niche that benefits from non-discretionary consumer demand and high barriers to entry. Investors and lenders are increasingly attracted by its stable occupancy, resilience to economic cycles, and opportunities for consolidation and technological advancement.
Industry Performance Overview
Market Size & Growth: The U.S. refrigerated warehousing industry has expanded consistently in recent years, underpinned by rising food consumption and supply chain modernization. Industry revenue reached an estimated $8.65 billion in 2023 and about $9.05 billion in 2025. This marks a rebound from a brief pandemic-related dip in 2020, and a return to a long-term growth trajectory. Historically, annual growth averaged ~2–3%in real terms; for instance, revenues grew from ~$7.8 billion in 2018 to ~$8.6 billion in 2023 (a ~2.1% CAGR). Future growth is forecast to be positive but modest – roughly 1.8% per year through 2030 – indicating a mature but expanding industry. By 2030, market size is expected to approach $10 billion, reflecting steady demand for cold storage services even as efficiency gains temper the pace of revenue growth.
Employment & Facilities: Alongside revenue growth, the industry’s physical footprint and workforce have also expanded. The U.S. has over 3,000 refrigerated warehouse facilities in operation, up from about 2,524 establishments in 2020 to ~3,053 in 2025. Industry-wide employment stands at approximately 63,000 workers in 2025, rising from ~55–60k a few years prior. Job growth is expected to continue as new facilities come online – projections show industry employment reaching ~69,000 by 2030. Notably, productivity has improved through automation (discussed later), so employment growth (≈1.8% CAGR) is roughly in line with revenue growth. Wages totaled about $3.7 billion in 2025, indicating the labor-intensive nature of the business. Overall, the sector’s performance reflects moderate growth with low volatility – it serves essential markets (food retail, food service, pharmaceuticals) that tend to be resilient even in downturns, supporting consistent expansion
.
Demand Drivers
Multiple macro and micro factors are fueling demand for refrigerated storage services in the U.S. These demand drivers include:
Shifting Consumer Preferences: Consumers are buying more fresh, organic, and premium foods, which require robust cold chains. Health-conscious spending on high-quality perishables (produce, dairy, meats) has grown, boosting demand for refrigerated warehousing to keep these items fresh. Higher disposable incomes have led to more organic and all-natural brands in grocery stores, which depend on efficient cold storage and distribution. This trend provides a steady tailwind for the industry, though it also means cold storage volumes can be sensitive to consumer confidence (premium food sales may dip if economic conditions tighten).
E-Commerce Grocery & Home Delivery: The rise of online grocery shopping and meal delivery is a major growth catalyst. U.S. online grocery sales, which were only ~3% of grocery spend in 2019, surged during the pandemic and are forecast to keep rising at ~11.7% CAGR through 2027. As online grocery’s share of the market expands (projected ~13.6% by 2027), retailers and delivery platforms are investing in cold storage infrastructure to fulfill orders rapidly. This has driven significant outsourcing to third-party cold logistics providers – many grocers and e-commerce firms prefer to rely on specialized refrigerated 3PL warehouses for staging online ordersfile-7661fn15owvaeskf94csc6. The demand for urban and regional cold storage facilitieshas increased to enable same-day or next-day delivery of groceries and meal kits, fundamentally changing the landscape of storage needs toward more distributed cold facilities.
Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) Initiatives: Sustainability imperatives are reshaping the industry’s practices and spurring new investments. Leading cold storage operators are emphasizing ESG compliance – for example, installing energy-efficient refrigeration systems and pursuing lower-emission operations – to meet government standards and attract ESG-focused investors. By reducing refrigerant leakage and power consumption, companies not only cut costs but also align with stricter environmental regulations (e.g. phasing out high-GWP refrigerants) and qualify for “green” financing. Publicly traded warehouse operators are especially focused on ESG as a competitive differentiator. This trend drives upgrades of older facilities (to be more sustainable) and can generate additional demand for new, state-of-the-art cold storage built to higher environmental standards. In sum, ESG pressures are pushing the sector toward modern, eco-friendly facilities – a challenge but also a driver of new capital projects.
Pharmaceutical and Biotech Cold Chain: Growth in temperature-sensitive pharmaceuticals is an emerging demand vector for cold storage. The rise of biologic drugs, vaccines (e.g. mRNA COVID-19 vaccines), and other medicine requiring refrigeration or freezing has increased the need for specialized cold storage near research hubs, distribution centers, and hospitals. While food still dominates cold warehouse space, pharmaceuticals represent a small but rapidly growing segment. An aging U.S. population and advances in biotech are projected to boost medicine storage needs significantly in the coming decade. For example, many vaccines and gene therapies must be kept at strict temperatures, driving investments in pharma-grade cold facilities and vaults. Major population centers (with large healthcare networks) have seen new cold storage capacity for life sciences, and some food-grade warehouse operators are expanding services to pharma clients. This diversifying demand (beyond food) adds a new layer of growth, improving utilization of cold facilities year-round.
Global Trade and Food Imports/Exports: International trade patterns also influence cold storage demand. The U.S. imports large volumes of perishable produce, seafood, and other foods, and is a top exporter of items like meat and dairy. Expanded trade activity increases the need for refrigerated storage at port cities and border points. For instance, strong beef and poultry export demand can fill cold warehouses near Gulf and Atlantic ports, while imports of fruits by ocean freight require cold storage upon arrival. However, trade frictions pose a risk (as detailed later). In recent years, tariffs and trade disputes introduced uncertainty – e.g., a trade war could slow meat exports or raise produce import costs, tempering cold storage volumes. Still, as global food supply chains grow, the long-term trend is rising use of cold facilities to support import/export flows (with value-added services like inspection and repackaging for imported goods often handled in these warehouses).
Taken together, these drivers underscore that refrigerated storage demand is rooted in fundamental needs (food, health)while also being amplified by technology and consumer behavior shifts (online retail, premium preferences). The combination of sustained macro drivers (population growth, trade, income levels) and micro drivers (last-mile delivery expectations, health trends) provides a solid foundation for continued growth in this sector.
Competitive Landscape
The U.S. refrigerated storage industry is moderately concentrated and consolidating. A handful of large players command a significant share of the market, alongside numerous regional operators. Major companies include Lineage Logistics, Americold Realty Trust, and United States Cold Storage (USCS), which together account for well over half of industry revenue. Aggressive mergers and acquisitions in recent years have bolstered these firms’ market positions, even as new niche entrants emerge. The table below summarizes the top competitors:
Company | Estimated US Market Share | Profile and Recent Activity |
Lineage Logistics | ~31% of industry revenue | Largest cold storage operator globally. Privately founded, Lineage grew via an acquisition spree (50+ facilities acquired over the past decade) and in July 2024 went public, raising $4.4 billion in the year’s biggest IPOfile-7661fn15owvaeskf94csc6. Operates an extensive network with cutting-edge automation (~17% of its warehouses are automated). |
Americold Realty Trust | ~23% of industry revenue | Only publicly traded REIT focused on cold storage (NYSE: COLD). Americold runs ~250 facilities worldwide, with ~1.0 billion cubic feet of storage after acquisitions like Hall’s Warehouse (NE U.S., acquired for $489 million in 2020). Leverages scale and technology integration (cloud logistics systems) to serve major food producers. Headquarters in Atlanta. |
United States Cold Storage(USCS) | ~5% (estimated) | Third-largest provider, offering nationwide cold warehousing and logistics. USCS is a subsidiary of the Swire Group, with a focus on serving food manufacturers. It has been expanding capacity in key regions (e.g. a recent 8.6 million cubic-foot expansion in California’s Central Valley). |
Other operators | ~41% combined (fragmented) | Dozens of regional and specialized firms make up the remainder. Examples include Burris Logistics, VersaCold, and many local 3PL cold stores. While individually small, these players collectively serve local needs (often near farms or cities) and can be agile in niche markets (e.g. seafood ports or produce hubs). |
Industry concentration is increasing: The top two companies alone control over 50% of the market, a share that has grown in the past decade. Both Lineage and Americold have pursued consolidation strategies, acquiring competitors to extend their geographic reach and service offerings. This “roll-up” trend has resulted in a more consolidated industry structure (classified as moderate concentration by industry analysts). For instance, Lineage’s acquisition of ColdPoint Logistics in late 2024 (for ~$223 million) expanded its footprint in the U.S. Midwest, and Americold’s purchase of Hall’s Warehouse in 2020 enlarged its Northeast U.S. network. Major players are also forming joint ventures and partnerships to capture new business (e.g. teaming up with grocery chains or port operators). The outcome is a sector where scale matters: large operators benefit from national networks, diverse customer bases, and the ability to invest in new technology – making it harder for small independents to compete.
Barriers to Entry: It is challenging for new entrants to break into refrigerated storage at scale. Capital requirements are high, given that a single modern cold facility can cost 2–3 times as much per square foot to build as a dry warehouse. Established giants enjoy economies of scale and customer trust, allowing them to operate at lower cost per pallet and secure long-term contracts. Additionally, the big players have been digitizing their operations (proprietary warehouse management systems, automation) which raises the technological bar for newcomers. Rising operating costs (energy, compliance) also favor incumbents that can absorb or pass on these costs more easily. As a result, new standalone cold warehouses are often built only with a committed tenant or as part of an incumbent’s expansion, rather than by pure start-ups.
Competitive Dynamics: While third-party cold storage providers primarily compete on service quality, location, and price per pallet, they are increasingly facing indirect competition from vertical integration. Large food retailers and producers (e.g. Walmart, Costco, Amazon) have invested in building their own refrigerated distribution centers to gain control over their cold chains. This in-house approach by big downstream players can erode the client base for independent warehouse operators, especially for staple products with predictable volumes. In response, the major 3PL cold storage companies are diversifying services and emphasizing one-stop solutions (storage + transportation + inventory management) to remain indispensable to their customers.
Service differentiation is key: offering superior IT integration, value-added handling, or multi-region coverage can secure contracts in a competitive bidding environment. Despite these pressures, the industry’s high demand and limited supply mean that most large facilities run at high occupancy, and pricing power has improved in recent years. Many cold storage contracts include regular rate escalations, and operators have been able to pass on some cost increases to customers due to the strong demand (especially during the pandemic surge in frozen food storage).
In sum, the competitive landscape is defined by consolidation at the top (a few dominant firms driving M&A), significant entry barriers, and a need for all players to keep innovating (through technology and expanded services) to address evolving client expectations and competitive threats.
Operational Characteristics
Automation and Technology: Modern refrigerated warehouses are leveraging automation and advanced tracking to improve efficiency and reduce reliance on manual labor. A prime example is the use of Automated Storage and Retrieval Systems (ASRS) and high-bay racking in freezer environments, which allow pallets to be moved and retrieved by robotic cranes or shuttles in sub-zero temperatures. This technology significantly boosts throughput and storage density while minimizing the time human workers must spend in harsh cold conditions. Digital inventory management is also widespread – many operators employ RFID tagging and IoT sensors to track product movement and monitor temperature and humidity in real time. These systems provide granular visibility into stock levels and conditions, enhancing quality control and enabling faster, more accurate order fulfillment. For instance, RFID data on transit times and temperature fluctuations helps ensure food safety and can automatically flag any issues. Leading companies are even developing proprietary software platforms to integrate warehouse automation with transportation and customer ordering systems. Lineage Logistics, for example, has invested heavily in proprietary warehouse management software and reports that about 16–17% of its sites are now semi or fully automated, a figure that is expected to climb. Overall, technology adoption is transforming cold storage operations to be faster, more precise, and more scalable, which is especially crucial given labor constraints discussed below.
Labor Dynamics: Despite increased automation, refrigerated storage remains labor-intensive in many respects. Workers are needed for tasks like loading/unloading trucks, order picking (in chilled environments), maintenance of equipment, and oversight of inventory. However, labor in this sector faces unique challenges: jobs in below-freezing warehouses are physically demanding and require special training and gear. As a result, labor turnover tends to be higher and companies often must offer premium pay or incentives for freezer work. In 2025 the industry employs about 63,000 people across the US, with roles ranging from forklift operators and technicians to logistics managers. That workforce is growing (~1–2% annually) as new facilities open, but many employers report difficulty in hiring and retaining staff. Labor shortages in warehousing, in general, have impacted cold storage as well – an issue exacerbated by the uncomfortable working conditions in freezers. This has encouraged firms to deploy automated pallet shuttles, conveyors, and sortation systems to handle repetitive tasks and reduce the number of staff needed in the cold. Even so, human expertise is still critical: companies increasingly seek skilled technicians and data analysts who can manage automated systems and optimize warehouse operations. Training is a focus area, as employees must learn to work safely with robotics and complex refrigeration equipment. Notably, strong labor unions are not as common in private cold storage as in some other logistics sectors, but worker safety regulations (OSHA rules for cold environments) are strict. In summary, while automation is curbing labor growth and enhancing productivity, the human element remains vital – the sector is transitioning to fewer but more skilled workers who oversee high-tech cold facilities.
Capital Intensity & Costs: Refrigerated warehouses are capital-expenditure heavy operations. Building a new cold storage facility is substantially more expensive than a standard dry warehouse. Estimates put construction costs at $250–$350 per square foot for a cold facility, roughly 2–3 times the cost of a traditional ambient warehouse. These higher costs stem from specialized requirements: thick insulation in walls and floors, robust refrigeration systems (ammonia or CO2-based chillers, compressors), and features like heated concrete floors (to prevent freezer frost heave. Many cold warehouses also incorporate very high ceiling heights (40+ feet) to maximize cubic storage volume, custom racking systems, backup power generators, and advanced fire suppression – all of which drive up initial CapEx. Because of this, companies often require significant upfront investment and typically finance projects with a mix of debt and equity, or engage in build-to-suit leases with long terms to recoup costs. Ongoing operational costs are also substantial: energy usage is a major expense (refrigeration equipment running 24/7), and electricity price fluctuations directly impact profit margins. As a result, operators put great emphasis on efficiency – for instance, using energy management systems, thermal storage, and solar panels (where possible) to mitigate power costs. The high capital intensity means providers focus on keeping facilities as full as possible; utilization rates are critical to spread fixed costs. It also contributes to the high barriers to entry and encourages existing players to expand via acquisition (buying an operational facility can be more attractive than building new from scratch, given the cost and complexity of new construction).
Value-Added Services Evolution: The role of cold storage operators has been expanding beyond basic warehousing into more value-added logistics services. In today’s market, many refrigerated 3PLs offer integrated solutions such as case picking and repacking, product inspection, blast freezing, labeling, and distribution. For example, imported perishable goods often arrive in bulk and require repackaging and quality inspection before they enter domestic supply chains – tasks which cold storage providers handle for an extra fee. Similarly, some warehouses perform order assembly and cross-docking to distribute products directly to grocery stores or restaurants, effectively acting as distribution centers. Leading operators have also introduced services like temperaturing (bringing products to a desired temperature before delivery), online inventory portals for customers, and even transportation management (arranging refrigerated trucking for end-to-end cold chain service). These offerings allow cold storage firms to differentiate themselves and capture more of the value chain. According to industry insights, value-added services are key to attracting and retaining clients in an increasingly competitive environment. By providing services such as direct-to-store delivery coordination, e-commerce order picking, and supply chain consulting, cold storage companies become more deeply integrated with their customers’ operations. This not only generates additional revenue streams but also increases customer stickiness (a client relying on a range of logistics services is less likely to switch providers). As technology (like cloud-based inventory systems) becomes cheaper and more ubiquitous, even mid-sized cold warehouses are adopting software that lets them manage complex service offerings and share real-time data with customers. The overall trend is a shift from a “space for rent” model to a “full-service cold chain partner” model.
In summary, the operational profile of the refrigerated storage sector is characterized by high-tech facilities, significant capital and energy costs, a push toward automation, and a broadening of services beyond simple storage. Companies that effectively deploy automation and offer value-add services while controlling costs are best positioned to improve margins in this operationally challenging (but essential) industry.
Geographic Concentration
The refrigerated storage industry’s footprint closely mirrors the nation’s population centers, agricultural belts, and trade infrastructure. Cold storage capacity is heavily clustered in key states and logistics hubs, reflecting where perishable goods are produced, imported, exported, and consumed. According to industry data, just eight states account for over half of U.S. cold storage square footage, and the top 15 states make up roughly 70% of total capacity. The major state-level hubs include:
California – The Leading Hub (17% of U.S. Capacity): California is by far the largest state for refrigerated storage, holding about 17% of industry revenue and facilities. This dominance is driven by California’s enormous agricultural output (Central Valley farms, dairy industry, vineyards, etc.) which generates huge volumes of perishable products requiring cooling. Additionally, California’s population (nearly 40 million) and major port complexes in Los Angeles/Long Beach and Oakland mean massive inflows of imported produce and meats that go through cold storage. The state’s facilities support everything from produce distribution (e.g. citrus, berries, leafy greens) to food processing and export staging (e.g. almonds and dairy for export). Given its mix of production and consumption, California’s refrigerated warehouses are critical nodes for both domestic distribution and international trade. However, California’s energy costs and regulations are relatively high, which incentivizes operators to build very efficient, high-capacity facilities there.
Texas – A Cross-Border and Population Center (~7% share): Texas holds roughly 7% of U.S. refrigerated storage revenues. Key drivers are the state’s large population (second-largest state in population) and its role as a gateway for agricultural trade with Mexico. South Texas border cities (e.g. McAllen, Laredo) have significant cold storage to handle produce imports (avocados, berries, vegetables) from Mexico. Meanwhile, the Houston area, with its port and petrochemical industry, includes cold storage for both imports and exports (for instance, frozen meat exports). Texas also has major grocery distribution hubs around Dallas-Fort Worth and Houston serving the growing Sun Belt consumer base. The state’s relatively low land costs and central location make it a strategic spot for national food distributors. In short, Texas cold storage is bolstered by North–South trade flows and its booming local market.
Southeast (Georgia & Florida) – Ports and Regional Distribution (~10%+ combined): Georgia is a significant hub with about 5–6% of industry revenue, anchored by Atlanta (a major logistics nexus) and the Port of Savannah (one of the busiest U.S. container ports for food and refrigerated cargo). Georgia’s dense network of highways and railroads in the Southeast, along with its food processing industry (poultry production, etc.), underpin its cold storage strength. Notably, Georgia has a high share of industry employment (~10%), suggesting many labor-intensive facilities (like poultry cold stores) are located there. Florida accounts for ~4.6% of revenue, with cold facilities concentrated around Miami and Tampa. Florida is the entry point for a large volume of imported produce from Latin America (such as winter vegetables, tropical fruits, seafood), requiring immediate refrigeration on arrival. Additionally, Florida’s own agriculture (citrus, juice concentrate, etc.) and its huge tourist-driven hospitality industry drive demand for local cold storage. Together, the Southeast’s infrastructure and climate (year-round growing seasons, exportable harvests, etc.) make it a leading region for refrigerated warehousing.
Midwest & Great Lakes (Illinois, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, etc.): The Great Lakes and Midwest states collectively are another crucial cluster. Illinois (esp. the Chicago area) is a central hub due to its vast food manufacturing and distribution network – it hosts major frozen food producers and is a rail/truck crossroads for national distribution. Illinois holds ~5.4% of industry revenue. Wisconsin (around 4.8% of revenue) stands out for its dairy industry (cheese, ice cream) and meat processing, necessitating many cold storage facilities. Pennsylvania (about 6.2% of revenue) benefits from the busy Port of Philadelphia (a leading fruit import gateway) and proximity to Northeast population centers. Pennsylvania and neighboring New Jersey (5.0% of revenue) form a critical cold storage cluster serving the New York/New Jersey metro market – many refrigerated warehouses are located in New Jersey (with its lower costs and port access) to supply the NYC region. The Great Lakes region’s strategic location (linking Canadian trade and serving Midwestern cities) also drives cold storage demand – for example, states like Ohio and Michigan, while smaller in share (~2% each), have facilities supporting cross-border food trade with Canada and regional grocery chains.
Beyond these top areas, other states have notable niches: Washington state (~6.6% of revenue) is significant due to its apple and potato industries and the Port of Seattle/Tacoma (major for frozen french fry exports and seafood). New York is an interesting outlier – despite its population, it represents less than 1% of cold storage revenue, as cold warehouses serving New York City are typically across the Hudson in New Jersey (where land and power are cheaper). This highlights how logistics advantages and cost factors determine facility locations more than just nearby consumers.
In summary, geographic concentration in refrigerated storage follows the flows of food: from farm belts (California’s Central Valley, the Midwest, Pacific Northwest) to port cities (LA, Miami, Philadelphia) to big consumption zones (major metro areas). States like California, Texas, Georgia, Florida, Washington, Illinois, and Pennsylvania form the backbone of the nation’s cold chain infrastructure. These locations offer the trifecta of advantages – access to production (farms or food factories), connectivity (ports, highways, rail), and proximity to end markets – making them natural hubs for refrigerated warehousing. The regional differences in market dynamics (e.g. California’s focus on export agriculture vs. Georgia’s focus on import/export distribution) mean that operators tailor their facilities and services by region. However, one common challenge across regions is finding suitable sites (land near cities/ports is limited and expensive) and upgrading older facilities to meet modern needs in these high-demand areas. Despite these challenges, the structural need for cold storage in these key geographies is only expected to grow, following population growth in the Sun Belt and continued globalization of food supply chains.
Comparative Analysis: Refrigerated vs. General Industrial Real Estate
Refrigerated warehouses share some fundamentals with the broader industrial real estate market (both are warehouse facilities), but they differ markedly in key performance metrics and market dynamics. Below is a comparison of cold storage facilities versus the overall industrial property market:
Metric (2024) | Cold Storage (Specialized Industrial) | All Industrial (U.S. Average) |
Vacancy Rate | ~3–4% (historically very low). Cold storage vacancy was ~3.5% nationally in 2022, dipping to ~3.4% in early 2024 amid high demand. Top markets like Chicago even saw <1% vacancy. | ~7% (and rising). The overall industrial vacancy has increased from record lows (~4% in 2021) to ~7.1% by Q2 2025 as a wave of new supply outpaced absorption. Some big-box warehouse markets now have 8–9%+ vacancy. |
Rent Levels (NNN) | High premium rents: $15–$30 per sq ft per year for new cold facilities in major markets. Rents are generally 2–3× higher than comparably located dry warehouses due to specialized build-out and scarcity. For example, Dallas cold storage rents ~$15–$19, and Los Angeles cold rents $28–$32 (per SF, NNN). | Standard industrial rents: around $8–$10 per sq ft nationally (Q2 2025 average asking rent ~$11 for logistics space, though effective rents in many regions are lower after concessions). Rent growth in general industrial has slowed to ~2% YoY in 2025 as vacancies increase. Cold storage has maintained much higher rent growth due to lack of supply. |
Construction Pipeline | Limited but growing: After years of minimal speculative development, cold storage construction spiked recently. ~3.3 million SF of spec cold space was underway in 2022 (versus virtually none pre-2019), and by end of 2022 it hit a record ~9.8 million SF under development. This is a huge percentage jump for the niche (inventory grew ~8.6% in 2021 alone). However, in absolute terms it remains small. Developers remain cautious due to high costs – most projects are build-to-suit or require pre-leasing. | Robust pipeline: Over 250–300 million SF of industrial space is under construction nationally (as of 2025)following an e-commerce boom. For instance, ~209 million SF of large logistics facilities were being built in Q2 2025. Speculative building is common in hot distribution hubs. This surge has begun to outstrip demand, pushing vacancies up. In contrast, cold storage construction, while increasing, is a tiny fraction (~3–4%) of total industrial development. |
Market Size & Share | Niche segment: Roughly 250–300 million cubic feet of refrigerated space in public warehouses nationwide (approx. 625 million sq ft of cold/frozen space including private facilities). This is <2% of total U.S. industrial real estate inventoryby area. The sector historically saw <0.5% of CRE investment volume, though that is rising. | Mainstream market: The U.S. industrial property sector spans over 15 billion sq ft of warehouse/logistics space. It attracts the highest share of commercial real estate investment among property types in recent years. Industrial assets are relatively liquid, with tens of billions of dollars in annual transaction volume. Cold storage is now being included in industrial indices (e.g. NCREIF) to facilitate more institutional investment. |
Several key distinctions emerge from the above comparison:
Vacancy & Utilization: Cold storage is characterized by chronically tight vacancy. A 3–4% vacancy rate is essentially full occupancy when considering frictional space (needed for moving stock). In many top cold storage markets, vacancy rates are near zero for practical. By contrast, the overall industrial sector, while it enjoyed low vacancies in 2021–22, is now normalizing to higher vacancy levels (7–8%) due to a construction boom and some softening of demand post-pandemic. Cold storage’s low vacancy reflects structural undersupply – there are simply not enough freezer warehouses to meet demand – and the fact that tenants (food companies, etc.) are loath to give up space given how hard it is to find new cold space. This leads to longer-term commitments and higher utilization. As a result, cold storage rents and occupancy held strong even during economic shocks, whereas general warehouse space can see more cyclical vacancy swings.
Rent and Revenue Profile: Refrigerated facilities command a rent premium. Users are willing to pay much more per square foot for cold storage, both because of the higher cost to build/operate and due to lack of alternatives. For instance, triple-net rents that might be $6–$10 for a dry warehouse can easily be $18–$30 for a freezer facility in the same city. This means cold storage properties can generate higher income per SF, but they also come with higher expenses (utilities, maintenance). The spread in rents also reflects specialized services often bundled with cold space (tenants may be paying for handling, blast freezing, etc., not just space). In the broad industrial market, rent growth has begun to slow in 2024–25 as supply catches up to demand. Meanwhile, cold storage rents are still on an upswing because demand far exceeds supply in that niche. On a revenue growth basis, some analyses project cold storage real estate revenues to grow faster than overall industrial (one Colliers forecast cited ~13% annual cold storage market growth through 2030 globally, much higher than general logistics)– although that figure likely includes service revenue, not just rent.
Construction & Development: General industrial real estate saw an unprecedented building boom in recent years (hundreds of millions of square feet delivered, especially big-box fulfillment centers). In contrast, cold storage construction was historically minimal and mostly build-to-suit, due to the risk of building a costly freezer speculatively. This changed after 2020: the surge in demand and confidence in the sector led to record speculative development of cold storage in 2021–2022. Even so, the absolute scale is much smaller – the entire pipeline of cold projects in 2022 (~10 million SF) is only a few percent of what was being built in dry warehousing at the time. Importantly, nearly all new cold facilities are quickly absorbed or pre-leased, given the pent-up demand. In the broader market, some regions are now facing oversupply (rising vacancy) due to perhaps overbuilding of generic warehouse space. The cold storage sector remains undersupplied in comparison – indeed, capacity additions have merely dented the shortage, and industry experts note the U.S. could require dozens more big cold facilities to modernize the network (NAIOP estimated 100+ million SF of new cold storage will be built over 5 years starting 2021 to replace/augment aging stock). Thus, while general industrial developers are easing off due to higher vacancies, cold storage developers still see opportunity, albeit tempered by higher interest rates and costs.
Investment & Capital Market Dynamics: Cold storage real estate used to trade at higher cap rates (i.e., cheaper prices relative to income) than standard warehouses, reflecting perceived higher risk and limited buyer pool. Historically there was a 150–200 basis point cap rate spread between cold and dry warehouses, meaning if a generic warehouse was a 6% cap, a comparable cold asset might be 7.5–8%. However, as the sector has proven its resilience and more investors have entered, this spread dramatically narrowed. During the COVID-era rush (late 2021), prime cold storage cap rates compressed to under 5%, nearly on par with top-tier industrial. Even with recent interest rate rises, cold storage cap rates in late 2023 averaged around 6% – only roughly 0.4% higher than the overall industrial average, which is a historically small gap. In other words, investors are now pricing cold storage almost as core real estate, a big shift from a decade ago when it was niche and often ignored. Additionally, the share of institutional investors in cold storage deals has jumped in the last 5–8 years. The creation of new performance indices for cold storage (e.g., NCREIF tracking) and the entrance of public REIT capital (Americold, Lineage’s IPO) have further liquified the market. By contrast, general industrial is a very liquid, established asset class with many buyers; cold storage is catching up in acceptance. On the flip side, one risk unique to cold assets is specialization – if vacated, a cold warehouse is costly to repurpose into a dry warehouse or other use. This can make lenders a bit more cautious and keeps some spread in yields. But overall, the strong fundamentals of cold storage (very high occupancy, long lease tenures or stable service income, and necessity-based demand) have made it one of the best-performing industrial sub-segments in recent years.
In summary, refrigerated storage behaves as the “high-performance, specialized cousin” of general warehouse real estate – it boasts lower vacancies and higher rents (and historically higher yields) due to its scarcity and essential nature. It’s less prone to speculative overbuilding, which adds to its stability. For lenders and investors, cold storage properties present a different risk-return profile: higher operating and build costs, but also higher potential income and very dependable demand drivers (food & pharma). Many investors view cold storage as offering a defensive, bond-like income stream (people must eat, regardless of economy) with growth potential as the supply-demand imbalance gradually corrects. As the sector matures, its metrics are converging somewhat with the broader industrial market (e.g., cap rates narrowing), yet it remains distinctly supply-constrained and therefore continues to outshine general industrial on occupancy and rent growth.
Investment Considerations
From an investment perspective, refrigerated storage has moved into the spotlight as a sought-after asset class, but it comes with unique considerations. Below are key points for lenders, investors, and operators evaluating the sector:
Asset Performance & Stability: Refrigerated warehouses generally offer strong operating performance, marked by high occupancy rates and long-term tenant relationships. Food and pharmaceutical tenants prioritize reliability – moving out of a cold facility can be costly and disruptive – which often results in low turnover and steady cash flows for owners. Even during economic downturns, cold storage usage remains relatively stable (people continue to buy groceries and medicines), giving these assets a defensive, recession-resilient profile. For example, during the 2020 pandemic, while some commercial real estate segments saw vacancies spike, cold storage demand actually increased due to shifts in consumer buying (more frozen foods, grocery delivery) and emergency stockpiling. This resilience underpins investor confidence that cold storage assets can weather macroeconomic volatility better than many other property types.
M&A and Consolidation Activity: The cold storage sector has experienced significant M&A as investors and strategics consolidate facilities into larger platforms. This is evidenced by the expansion of Lineage and Americold through dozens of acquisitions (e.g., Americold’s $1.3 billion acquisition of Cloverleaf/Versacold in 2018, and multiple smaller deals since). Private equity has been actively rolling up regional operators into larger entities (Lineage itself was built by Bay Grove Capital via acquisitions). For investors, this consolidation trend means potential exit opportunities via portfolio sales to larger players or REITs at premium valuations. It also means new acquisitions often come at a valuation premium given the competition for scarce assets. M&A has driven up industry concentration and created efficiency gains (through network synergies and technology sharing), which can improve asset performance post-acquisition. However, integration risks and cultural differences must be managed. Lenders should note that consolidation has generally improved operators’ credit profiles as they gain scale. We expect continued M&A activity, including the possibility of more platform sales or even privatizations. For instance, one could envision Americold or Lineage acquiring a mid-size competitor, or infrastructure funds partnering with operators to acquire large portfolios. The fragmented 40% of the market(smaller players) presents further consolidation opportunities.
REITs and Capital Markets Strategy: The entrance of public capital has been a game-changer for the sector. Americold’s IPO in 2018 and Lineage’s planned REIT conversion/IPO in 2024 (successfully raising ~$4.4B) highlight investor appetite. As REITs, these companies can access relatively low-cost equity capital and debt financing to fuel growth. For investors, REITs provide a liquid way to invest in the cold storage theme and have helped bring transparency (through quarterly reporting) to an opaque industry. The REIT model also imposes discipline – e.g., dividend requirements that encourage operational cash flow stability. REIT strategies in cold storage often focus on sale-leaseback deals and development: Americold, for example, has done sale-leasebacks with food companies offloading their cold warehouses, then leasing them back on long terms – unlocking capital for the tenant and providing stable income for the REIT. We anticipate more sale-leaseback opportunities as food distributors and grocery chains monetize real estate to reinvest in core business. Additionally, the public markets’ valuation of cold storage (which, at its peak, implied very low cap rates ~5%) motivates REITs to keep growing their portfolios. For lenders, having a REIT as a sponsor/borrower can mean a stronger balance sheet and more transparency. Going forward, one strategic consideration is whether additional REITs or investment vehicles emerge – e.g., specialized infrastructure funds targeting cold storage, or foreign investors partnering with U.S. firms (given global interest in food logistics infrastructure). The recent inclusion of cold storage in major property indexes and the sector’s strong performance may indeed draw new capital sources.
Tenant Demand & Lease Structures: Unlike typical warehouses that often have single tenants on long leases, many large cold storage facilities operate on a 3PL model with multiple customers and shorter-term storage contracts. This means investment analysis must account for operating business performance (warehouse services revenue) in addition to rent. For pure owner-landlords leasing to an operator or single user, leases tend to be long-term (10-20 years) triple-net, often with built-in rent escalations to cover rising costs. Tenants in such cases are frequently credit-worthy food companies or distributors, making those leases bond-like. On the other hand, if an investor operates the facility (as Americold and Lineage do), revenue comes from many customers in the form of storage fees, throughput fees, etc. This can actually diversify risk (not reliant on one tenant) but requires strong operational expertise.
Tenant demand is robust across grocery, food service, and pharma sectors – most major tenants (e.g., supermarket chains, food producers) are seeking additional cold space due to the trends discussed (online grocery, etc.). The challenge is that tenants often plan years ahead for cold storage needs due to scarcity; when new facilities open, they often pre-lease much of the space. This can lead to high pre-leasing rates for new projects, mitigating lease-up risk for developers/investors. From a risk perspective, one consideration is tenant credit and industry: many top cold storage users are large, stable companies (e.g., Tyson Foods, Kroger, Pfizer for pharma), but the sector also serves smaller produce importers or meat wholesalers that can be less financially stable. Diversification of the customer mix is therefore a plus. In evaluating an investment, looking at the weighted average remaining contract length (WALT) and service agreements is key – typically, cold storage REITs maintain WALTs of ~3–5 years on service contracts, but critical customers often renew repeatedly. In summary, tenant demand far outstrips supply at present, so occupancy risk is low; the main tenant-related focus for investors is on ensuring charges and rent escalations keep up with operating cost inflation, and that facilities are in the right locations to retain tenants long-term.
Returns and ROI Expectations: Historically, cold storage offered higher cap rates (higher yield) than traditional industrial, as mentioned, often 100–300 bps premium in past years. This was due to specialized nature, lower liquidity, and perceived operational risk. However, as fundamentals strengthened, cap rates compressed. Investors today might underwrite stabilized Class A cold assets at cap rates in the mid-5% to low-6% range, only slightly above regular warehouses. Total returns can be attractive: in addition to ~5–6% income yields, there is growth potential from rent increases and expansions (many cold facilities have expansion land or higher rent growth). Internal rates of return (IRRs) on value-add cold storage projects (e.g., building a new freezer warehouse) can be in the low-to-mid teens, reflecting the development risk and lease-up efforts. Core acquisitions of fully leased facilities trade at lower yields (hence lower IRRs, high single digits). Investors also factor in higher maintenance capex – refrigeration equipment and insulation panels require upkeep, meaning more capital expenditure over time compared to a dry warehouse. Provisions for capital reserves are often higher in underwriting. Nonetheless, the supply-demand imbalance suggests continued rent growth above inflation, which can enhance ROI. One noteworthy point: because many cold storage facilities are older (average age ~37 years), there is an investment thesis around upgrading or redeveloping aging assets: buying an old facility at a discount and refurbishing it to modern specs can yield strong returns by capturing higher rents from top-tier food clients. In essence, investors can approach cold storage as both a core-plus income play (via stable existing facilities) and a value-add/development play (via new construction or refurbishment in undersupplied markets).
In conclusion, refrigerated storage offers an attractive investment proposition characterized by durable demand, improving liquidity, and solid returns – but it requires comfort with an operationally intensive asset type. Investors and lenders should weigh the stable cash-flow profile and growing market against the specialized operational risks and high capital needs. Many have concluded that the sector’s fundamentals (food being a necessity, secular growth of e-commerce and population) make it a compelling long-term hold. Going forward, we expect more capital to flow into this space, possibly compressing yields further and spurring creative financing (such as joint ventures between operators and institutional investors). Those already invested have seen portfolio values climb as cap rates fell, and they have generally enjoyed strong rent collections even in turbulent times, underscoring the defensive-growth nature of the asset class.
Risks and Challenges
Despite its positive outlook, the refrigerated storage industry faces several risks and challenges that stakeholders must navigate:
Regulatory Pressures: The sector is subject to a range of regulations that can add cost and complexity. Environmental regulations are particularly impactful – for instance, new rules under the American Innovation and Manufacturing (AIM) Act are phasing down HFC refrigerants due to their high global warming potential This forces warehouse operators to retrofit or replace refrigeration systems with greener alternatives (like ammonia or CO₂-based systems) to remain compliant, requiring significant capital outlays. Energy efficiency standards are also tightening; states like California have introduced stringent building codes for industrial refrigeration. At the same time, food safety regulations (e.g., the FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act) mandate detailed temperature monitoring, sanitary operating procedures, and traceability for cold-stored food. Compliance can increase operating costs (through additional record-keeping, inspections, and investments in monitoring technology). While large operators can absorb these costs, smaller facilities might struggle, potentially accelerating industry consolidation. Failure to comply with regulations can result in fines or shutdowns, making regulatory risk a critical focus. In short, the industry must continuously invest in upgrading equipment and protocols to meet evolving environmental and safety standards, which can pressure margins if not managed proactively.
Vertical Integration by Food Giants: One structural threat is the trend of large food retailers and producers bringing cold storage in-house. Companies like Walmart, Amazon (Whole Foods), Kroger, and Tyson Foods have been investing in their own distribution centers and cold warehouses. The motivation is greater control over supply chains and cost savings in the long run. For example, Amazon has built refrigerated fulfillment centers for its grocery business, and Walmart operates regional perishable distribution centers. Every time a major player opts to expand their proprietary cold storage network, it potentially reduces demand for third-party storage. IBISWorld notes that while vertical integration requires heavy capital (feasible mainly for large-scale producers/retailers), it provides those companies with full control and can bypass the 3PL providers. The risk to the industry is a slow erosion of the traditional customer base: if big clients handle more internally, 3PL warehouses may face lower occupancy or pricing pressure. Already, some food wholesalers and retailers have cut back on external storage needs by buying directly from manufacturers and streamlining their distribution. To counter this, third-party providers are emphasizing value-added services and flexibility that in-house operations may lack. Nonetheless, vertical integration remains a long-term challenge – especially if technologies like automation make in-house facilities easier to run. The impact so far is limited (most companies still rely on third-party cold storage for at least a portion of their needs), but it is a trend to watch.
Trade Frictions and Geopolitical Factors: The refrigerated storage business is intertwined with global trade flows (for imported fruits, seafood, exported meat, etc.), which means it is exposed to international trade risks. Recent years have seen tariff wars and geopolitical tensions (e.g., U.S.-China trade war, NAFTA renegotiation, Brexit, Russia sanctions) that have introduced volatility in agricultural trade. Tariffs or quotas on food products can quickly shift storage demand – for instance, if China places tariffs on American pork or dairy, the backlog in U.S. cold storage could rise because those products can’t be exported as planned, filling freezer warehouses domestically. Conversely, import restrictions can reduce volume through port cold storages. IBISWorld specifically flags uncertainty from the ongoing trade war (as of 2025) as a factor that could temper growth in traded goods storage. Political events can also disrupt supply chains (e.g., war in Ukraine affecting global grain/meat trade patterns or ocean shipping). Additionally, stringent border inspections for food safety (in response to disease outbreaks, etc.) can cause delays that require more storage time for shipments. Cold storage operators need to remain agile – a sudden glut or shortage of certain food commodities can occur, impacting occupancy. For investors, this means revenues could be somewhat affected by export market swings or import season variability. Mitigating this, the domestic demand for food is huge and stable, so the base business is safe; it’s the incremental trade volumes that add a layer of uncertainty. Over a 5–10 year horizon, trade policy changes (new agreements or disputes) are a wildcard that can regionally benefit some cold hubs and hurt others (e.g., if Pacific fruit imports shift from one port to another due to tariffs or infrastructure, related warehouses may see business fluctuate).
Capital Cost and Interest Rate Pressures: The recent rise in interest rates and tighter financing conditions pose a financial risk to this capital-intensive industry. Building new cold storage or upgrading existing ones requires substantial capital, and higher borrowing costs can delay or cancel projects that looked feasible in a low-rate environment. Developers now face higher debt service burdens, which can make the required rents for new projects harder to achieve. Similarly, existing operators with variable-rate loans or upcoming refinancings could see interest expenses climb, squeezing their cash flows. There is also the risk that some highly leveraged owners, who acquired properties at record low cap rates in 2020–2021, might face a “debt funding gap” if property values soften or lenders become more conservative. This could lead to distress or forced asset sales in some cases (though none widely observed yet in the cold segment). Higher capital costs also affect M&A; aggressive expansion via acquisition may slow down unless justified by strong synergies, as private equity’s cost of capital has increased. In addition to financing costs, construction costs have been elevated due to inflation in materials and labor – coming on top of already high base costs for cold facilities. This means ROI on new developments might be lower, potentially constraining the supply pipeline (which in turn keeps existing assets more valuable, a paradoxical effect). For investors and lenders, the key is cautious underwriting with realistic exit cap rates and contingency for capex. For operators, ensuring leases and service contracts have escalators tied to inflation helps manage the impact of rising operating costs (utilities, labor) and financing. Nonetheless, capital-related pressures are a current headwind that requires prudent financial strategy, especially after a period of cheap capital that fueled rapid expansion.
Aging Infrastructure & Technological Obsolescence: A less immediately visible but significant challenge is the age profile of U.S. cold storage infrastructure. A majority of the nation’s cold warehouses are decades old – by one estimate, about 60% of cold storage facilities were built before 1990. These older buildings often have low clear heights (20 feet or less), less efficient insulation, and outdated refrigeration systems. They were not designed for modern automation or the scale needed today. As a result, they face functional obsolescence: higher operating costs (using older, less efficient compressors, for example) and difficulty accommodating technologies like ASRS or high-density racking. Aging facilities may also struggle to meet new food safety or environmental standards without significant retrofits. The industry thus must invest heavily in upgrading or replacing older warehouses. Operators of older sites risk losing business to newer facilities that can offer lower energy costs per pallet and better service (e.g., faster handling through automation). There have been instances of major customers opting to relocate from an outdated cold store to a brand-new one for such benefits. Moreover, older refrigeration systems have higher failure risks, and a major breakdown could be catastrophic (product spoilage liabilities). This creates a risk for insurers and owners alike. While this “age challenge” is also an opportunity (to develop new state-of-the-art capacity), it requires capital and can strain companies that own large portfolios of legacy sites. Some are responding by installing new racks, adding ammonia/CO₂ systems, or raising roof heights (if structurally possible) to extend life. However, not all old facilities can be economically modernized, and we may see more retirements or replacements of cold storage stock in the coming years. For the industry, this is a double-edged sword: it keeps supply tight (if old capacity comes offline faster than new is built), but it also demands large reinvestment. In a worst-case scenario, failure to modernize could leave some operators with stranded assets that can’t compete, hitting their financial performance.
In summary, while the refrigerated storage sector’s fundamentals are strong, these risks – regulatory compliance costs, the threat of clients insourcing, trade volatility, higher capital costs, and infrastructure challenges – must be carefully managed. Successful operators will be those who stay ahead of regulatory mandates, innovate to provide indispensable services (mitigating vertical integration), maintain financial discipline in a higher-rate environment, and proactively upgrade their facilities. Lenders and investors should stress-test their investments against these scenarios (e.g., rising power costs or loss of a big customer to insourcing) to ensure resilience. The industry’s history of adapting (e.g., phasing in new refrigerants, adopting solar power, diversifying customer mix) gives confidence that these challenges can be overcome, but they will shape the strategic decisions in the years ahead.
Strategic Outlook (5–10 Year Forward View)
Looking ahead, the refrigerated storage sector is positioned for steady expansion and significant evolution over the next decade. The strategic outlook is underpinned by structural growth drivers, rapid technology integration, and an investment landscape that continues to mature. Key elements of the 5–10 year outlook include:
Structural Growth & Demand Trajectory: The fundamental demand for cold storage is expected to grow consistentlythrough 2030 and beyond. Demographic trends support this: a larger population (and aging demographics requiring more medicines) will consume more temperature-sensitive products. Consumer spending on food is forecast to rise ~1.9% annually through 2030, which will directly boost demand for warehousing of food products. Health and wellness trends – from fresh produce to frozen healthy meals – are likely to persist, keeping up the need for extensive cold distribution networks. Even if economic cycles fluctuate, the baseline consumption of refrigerated/frozen goods is relatively inelastic. By 2030, industry revenue is expected to approach $10 billion and continue rising thereafter at a modest pace. However, growth will not be uniform: e-commerce grocery is still in early innings, so as it potentially doubles or triples its share of grocery sales in the next decade, it could create spurts of demand for new urban cold facilities. Additionally, the pharmaceutical cold chain will likely expand at a faster clip than food (global pharma cold chain logistics have very high growth rates), which might open a new vertical for warehouse operators – possibly leading to more specialized pharma cold warehouses (with tighter temperature controls, etc.) being developed. In the medium term, we anticipate continued tight supply-demand balance; it will take years of building to alleviate the current undersupply of modern cold storage, so occupancy should remain high and rent growth above inflation. The industry’s long-term growth is resilient but likely moderate – think low single-digit annual growth – barring any step-change events like major government investment in food infrastructure or a massive shift to plant-based foods altering supply chains (these are wildcards).
Technology Integration & Automation: The next decade will see deeper tech integration in cold storage operations. Automation, still in early adoption phase, is poised to accelerate as costs come down and proven use-cases multiply. We expect a higher proportion of new warehouses to be fully automated or semi-automated, using robotics for pallet handling and even AI-driven picking systems for mixed-case orders. Existing facilities will retrofit where possible (for example, using automated shuttles in aisles, even if a full ASRS isn’t feasible in an older building). Advancements in warehouse management software and data analytics will allow operators to optimize inventory placement, predict throughput peaks, and reduce energy usage (by, say, adjusting cooling based on stock levels). Energy technology is another focus: given sustainability goals, many cold facilities will adopt solutions like microgrid power systems, on-site solar with battery storage, and advanced refrigeration cycles to cut their carbon footprint. Already, technologies such as low-charge ammonia and CO₂ refrigeration systems are gaining popularity for their efficiency and lower environmental risk. We anticipate more cold warehouses will integrate renewable energy – for instance, solar panels on large warehouse rooftops paired with batteries can offset some of the massive electricity consumption (some operators are piloting this to achieve net-zero energy goals at certain sitesfile-7661fn15owvaeskf94csc6). ESG-driven tech upgrades (like electric yard trucks, green building designs) will become commonplace as both regulators and clients push for greener logistics. Another aspect is digital connectivity: by 2030, it’s likely that most cold warehouses will offer real-time data APIs to customers, blockchain traceability for food safety, and highly synchronized systems with carriers to minimize door dwell times (reducing thermal loss). All of this will make the cold chain more responsive and transparent. Labor will shift accordingly – fewer forklift drivers, more technicians and IT personnel on-site. In summary, technology will enable scaling up capacity without linear increases in labor, and help maintain margins under cost pressures. The cold storage facilities of 2030 will, in many cases, be smart warehouses: densely automated, energy-efficient, and integrated nodes in the digital supply chain.
Continued Institutionalization & Investment Themes: The coming years should see refrigerated storage further established as an institutional asset class. With performance data becoming available and the success of current REITs, more institutional capital (pensions, sovereign funds, insurance companies) is expected to allocate to cold storage, either through partnerships, dedicated funds, or acquisitions. We may see new entrants such as infrastructure funds or global logistics REITs acquiring U.S. cold assets to diversify their portfolios. This influx of capital will likely keep cap rates relatively low (i.e., high valuations), assuming interest rates don’t spike dramatically. From an investment thesis standpoint, one theme is “core infrastructure”: positioning cold storage as critical infrastructure for food security. This could even invite public-sector support or favorable financing (some state/local governments might offer incentives for building cold storage in food deserts or near ports to strengthen supply chains). Another theme is sale-leaseback and development joint ventures – as user demand is strong, investors might partner with food companies to build facilities that are then leased long-term (ensuring occupancy from day one). We also expect the consolidation trend to continue: it’s plausible that by 2030, the top four players could control well over 70% of the market (versus ~60% now), through further M&A and organic growth. It wouldn’t be surprising if a major global logistics firm (for example, a large warehouse REIT or 3PL that isn’t currently big in cold storage) decides to acquire a cold chain operator to get a foothold, given the attractive fundamentals. For operators, scalability will be key – those who can tap public markets or large private capital pools have an advantage in expanding and adopting tech. Smaller operators may survive by specializing (e.g., focusing on a particular commodity or region) or by becoming acquisition targets. In essence, the financialization of cold storage will proceed, bringing more liquidity and perhaps more volatility (as valuations move with investor sentiment). But broadly, more capital should translate into more buildings and modernization – helping alleviate the national capacity crunch over time.
Evolution of Market Structure & Services: Over the next decade, we expect the lines between refrigerated storage and other logistics services to blur further. Vertical integration and partnerships may take new forms – for example, major grocery chains could partner with 3PLs to operate their in-house facilities, combining the grocer’s network with the 3PL’s expertise. Or cold storage companies might team up with last-mile delivery firms to create end-to-end cold supply chains for e-grocery. We may also see geographic expansion to secondary markets: as the top metros get saturated, growth could occur in mid-sized cities or emerging port regions (e.g., inland port areas, or cities like Savannah, Reno, San Antonio which are growing logistics hubs). Each new large food production facility (like a new meat plant or vertical farm) could spawn local cold storage needs, so there may be niche expansions around those. Internationally, U.S. operators might expand abroad; conversely, foreign investors may bring best practices from high-tech facilities in Europe or Asia (for instance, Japan and Europe have many fully automated cold stores) into the U.S. Another aspect is resilience planning: after the pandemic, companies are more aware of supply chain risks, so they might maintain higher inventory levels of frozen goods as safety stock. This could sustain higher utilization of storage even in normal times (a strategic reserve of food concept). Furthermore, climate change may alter agricultural patterns (e.g., requiring more cold storage in northern states if growing regions shift), an angle to monitor in the very long term.
Long-Term Outlook & Thesis: In 5–10 years, the refrigerated storage industry will likely be larger, more high-tech, and more interconnected. While growth rates might not be explosive, the sector’s profile as essential infrastructure will be solidified. Structural tailwinds (food consumption, health needs, globalization of taste) ensure that demand will keep climbing, albeit gradually. By 2035 or so, one could envision the U.S. cold storage network to be much more modern: a significant portion of today’s old facilities will be replaced by new ones featuring 50-foot clear heights, automation, and green designs. The industry may also play a role in reducing food waste (with better cold chain integrity) and contributing to sustainability goals (through energy innovations). From an investor’s perspective, the investment thesis remains compelling: a necessary service with high barriers and consistent demand, now with an added upside from operational improvements and consolidation. The key risks we outlined (regulation, integration by customers, etc.) will continue to be relevant, but the industry’s trajectory suggests it will adapt and remain integral to the economy.
In conclusion, refrigerated storage in the U.S. is set to thrive as a strategic asset class in the coming decade. Stakeholders should expect a landscape characterized by moderate growth, significant capital investment, and ongoing innovation. Those operators and investors who embrace new technologies, maintain financial flexibility, and focus on delivering value in the cold chain will be best positioned to capitalize on the opportunities ahead. The combination of structural necessity and transformation makes this an exciting sector to watch – one that will continue to underpin the broader trends in food consumption, health, and supply chain optimization for years to come.
May 21, 2025 by a collective of authors at MMCG Invest, LLC, warehouse, logistic and cold and refrigerated feaisbility study consultants
Sources: Industry research reports and data (2024–2025) company filings, and market analyses. (All numeric figures cited are from the latest available industry data; no proprietary sources are explicitly referenced per guidelines.)
Comments