Link Logistics Real Estate: Strategic Analysis

Concord Airport Business Park - 7045 Aviation Blvd NW, Concord, NC 28027

Link Logistics is a U.S.-based real estate company that specializes in logistics-focused industrial properties. Founded by Blackstone in 2019, the company owns, operates, and develops one of the largest portfolios of logistics real estate in the United States. As of mid-2025, Link Logistics manages over 500 million square feet of industrial space across more than 3,000 properties. Its portfolio includes last-mile distribution centers, bulk warehouses, and infill logistics facilities strategically located in major metropolitan areas such as Los Angeles, New York, Chicago, Dallas, and Atlanta. The company’s assets are positioned to serve high-demand urban markets and are designed to support the evolving needs of e-commerce, retail, and third-party logistics providers. Link Logistics also integrates sustainability and smart building technologies across its portfolio to enhance operational efficiency and reduce environmental impact.

Portfolio Diversification and Risk Profile

Link Logistics’ portfolio spans 2,661 properties (including 47 land parcels) with a total built area of 359 million square feet, plus an additional 12 million square feet delivered in the last 24 months and about 0.7 million square feet currently under construction [1]. This extensive, nationwide asset base makes Link one of the largest logistics landlords in the U.S. The properties are overwhelmingly industrial in nature (warehouses and distribution centers), with only minor exposure to other property types, reflecting a focused strategy in the logistics real estate sector. Geographically, the portfolio is spread across key distribution markets; top markets include Atlanta, Dallas–Fort Worth, Chicago, and major coastal logistics hubs in California and the Northeast, none of which alone accounts for an outsized share of total assets [1]. This broad geographic reach helps mitigate regional market risk, as performance is not overly reliant on any single local economy.

In terms of risk management and capital allocation, Link has recently been a net seller of assets. Over the past two years, the company executed approximately $5.9 billion in dispositions (about 405 properties sold) against roughly $0.6 billion in acquisitions [1]. This significant sell-off suggests an emphasis on portfolio optimization and possibly profit-taking in a high-valuation environment, which can reduce exposure to potential market downturns. Despite the sales, Link’s occupancy (or conversely 12.8% vacancy) indicates room for lease-up and growth within the existing portfolio [1]. The elevated vacancy rate relative to stabilized peers likely reflects a combination of recently delivered speculative developments and a transitional tenant mix. This temporary drag on occupancy is part of the risk profile: new developments and acquisitions may initially come with vacancy or lease-up risk, which Link’s platform can absorb given its scale and diversified tenant base.

Tenant diversification is another key aspect of Link’s risk profile. The company serves a wide array of tenants across different industries, including manufacturing, retail/e-commerce, transportation and warehousing, among others [1]. In fact, no single tenant industry dominates the rent roll, which insulates the income stream from sector-specific downturns. With over 1,300 tenants occupying the 500+ million square feet portfolio, Link’s rent exposure is spread across hundreds of customers. These range from large Fortune 500 companies to small local businesses, as evidenced by the distribution of tenant sizes – there are on the order of 100 major tenants each occupying more than 500,000 square feet, while the majority are smaller occupiers in the sub-50,000 square foot range [1]. This structure ensures that credit risk is not overly concentrated: even if one big tenant (for example, a large e-commerce retailer) were to downsize, the overall impact on Link would be buffered by the breadth of other tenant relationships. The diversified tenant base, combined with the geographic spread, provides Link Logistics a “very low risk” profile in terms of avoiding dependency on any single tenant or market for cash flows [1]. Overall, the portfolio’s diversity and scale serve as a strong risk mitigant, positioning Link to weather economic fluctuations better than more concentrated industrial portfolios.

Peer Comparison

When comparing Link Logistics to its publicly traded peers, the most notable benchmark is Prologis, Inc., the world’s largest industrial REIT. Scale and footprint set these two apart from the rest of the industry. Link’s portfolio (over 500 million square feet) is roughly half the size of Prologis’s ~1.3 billion square feet global portfolio [2]. However, unlike Prologis which operates in 19 countries, Link’s assets are entirely within the United States, focusing on the domestic market. This means that while Prologis achieves diversification across continents, Link’s diversification is within the U.S. – a broad spread across many American markets but without international exposure. For a private entity like Link, this domestic focus aligns with its mandate and capital sourcing (primarily from Blackstone’s funds), whereas Prologis as a public REIT expands wherever it sees strategic opportunity globally.

Occupancy and leasing performance are other areas of contrast. Prologis consistently maintains very high occupancy levels (mid-90s percentage range) – for example, an average occupancy of about 95–96% in late 2024 [2] – reflecting strong demand and proactive asset management for its stabilized portfolio. Link Logistics, by comparison, currently operates with a lower occupancy (around 87% occupied, given the 12–13% vacancy noted) [1]. This gap can be attributed to Link’s rapid growth and churn: the aggressive development and disposition activity means more properties in lease-up or transition at any given time. In essence, Prologis’s portfolio is closer to a steady-state equilibrium, whereas Link’s is in flux as it digests new projects and capital recycling. While Prologis, as a public company, may prioritize steady occupancy and incremental development, Link’s private ownership by Blackstone allows it to accept short-term vacancy or lower yield on new acquisitions in pursuit of long-term value creation (e.g. developing modern logistics facilities that lease up over time).

Financial strategy differences also emerge. Prologis has a lower leverage profile and access to public equity/debt markets, which contribute to its A-rated balance sheet and lower cost of capital. Link, funded through private equity capital, might employ higher leverage to boost returns, although Blackstone’s sponsorship ensures it still has substantial financial backing. Moreover, Prologis’s growth has come not only organically but via large mergers (such as the 2020 Duke Realty acquisition) – something facilitated by public stock as currency. Link’s growth, conversely, has been through private acquisitions and development, and its recent net selling indicates a more opportunistic approach to crystallizing gains versus Prologis’s buy-and-hold strategy. Despite these differences, Link’s sheer scale, second only to Prologis in the U.S., places it firmly in the top-tier of logistics real estate operators. Both firms benefit from economies of scale, sophisticated property management, and tenant relationships in the logistics space, but Link leverages Blackstone’s agile private-capital model, whereas Prologis operates with the transparency and steady pace of a public REIT. For stakeholders, this comparison highlights that Link achieves many of the same benefits as a public REIT (diversification, scale, professional management) while employing a more aggressive portfolio turnover and growth strategy behind the scenes.

Strategy Replication and Implications

Investors: For institutional investors, Link Logistics serves as a blueprint for building a large-scale diversified logistics portfolio. Replicating Link’s strategy would require significant capital resources and patience. Investors looking to emulate its success might either invest through private funds (like those managed by Blackstone) or pursue a roll-up strategy – acquiring numerous individual industrial assets and smaller portfolios across various markets to achieve scale. The key takeaway for investors is the importance of diversification and active portfolio management: Link’s risk-adjusted success comes from not just accumulating assets, but also continuously pruning and optimizing the portfolio (as seen in its disposal activity). This suggests that investors must be willing to rotate assets – selling mature or non-core properties to free up capital for new opportunities – in order to maintain growth and resilience. Moreover, Link’s model highlights the value of sector specialization; an investor focusing on a single asset class (logistics) can still mitigate risk through breadth within that class. However, only investors with long-term vision and substantial operational expertise can replicate such a strategy, given the complexities of managing thousands of tenants and properties. For most, a more practical approach to gain similar exposure is investing in or alongside platforms like Link (or its peers) rather than trying to build a comparable portfolio from scratch.

Developers: The rise of Link Logistics underscores critical lessons for real estate developers in the industrial/logistics space. Firstly, scale matters – partnering with or developing for large platforms can provide steady demand for new projects. Developers aiming to replicate Link’s strategy on a smaller scale should focus on core logistics hubs and build properties that meet the modern standards that firms like Link and Prologis require (high clear heights, large truck courts, proximity to highways and population centers, energy-efficient designs, etc.). By aligning development projects with the institutional criteria of players like Link, developers can either attract these firms to acquire the projects post-stabilization or form joint ventures to grow together. Another implication is the importance of market selection: Link’s coverage of all major U.S. logistics markets means developers with multi-market presence or those who can source deals in top-tier locations will be more successful in mirroring Link’s broad approach. Finally, developers should note the emphasis on portfolio strategy – it’s not just about one-off developments, but creating a pipeline that feeds a larger entity’s growth needs. Those who establish a track record of delivering quality product in multiple markets may find firms like Link willing to pay a premium or partner for a pipeline of assets, effectively piggybacking on Link’s strategy rather than fully replicating it independently.

Lenders: For lenders and financiers, Link Logistics represents a relatively lower-risk profile in the industrial real estate realm due to its diversification and sponsorship, but it also highlights what it takes to finance such a platform. Replicating Link’s strategy from a lending perspective means being attuned to the portfolio-level credit risk rather than just individual properties. Lenders can take comfort in the diversified income stream of a Link-type borrower – the variety of tenants and markets provides a cushion against localized downturns or single tenant defaults. Thus, financing a large diversified logistics portfolio can be viewed as more secure than lending on a single-market, single-tenant industrial portfolio, all else equal. However, lenders should also consider the execution risk and business plan: Link’s model involves active buying, selling, and development, which introduces cash flow volatility and requires expert management. When underwriting loans, especially for those attempting to emulate Link, lenders will scrutinize the sponsor’s track record (e.g., Blackstone’s expertise) and the flexibility of the capital structure to handle asset turnover and lease-up periods. The implication is that while a diversified logistics portfolio is an attractive collateral pool, only those borrowers with proven asset management capability and sufficient equity (to weather vacancies and market cycles) will truly succeed in replicating Link’s approach. Lenders may favor borrowers who demonstrate a clear strategy for diversification and risk management – traits embodied by Link – and may price loans more competitively for portfolios that achieve this scale and granularity of risk spread. In summary, Link’s case teaches lenders that the quality of sponsorship and the strategy behind the portfolio are as crucial as the physical assets in determining creditworthiness for large-scale logistics real estate ventures.

November 17, 2025, a collective of authors at MMCG Invest, LLC, bankable feasibility study consultants

• MMCG Database. Internal proprietary data on Link Logistics portfolio metrics, including asset count, square footage, tenant composition, geographic distribution, leasing activity, and transaction volumes, as of mid-2025.

• Prologis, Inc. “Q4 2024 Results and 2025 Outlook.” Investor Relations. January 2025.

• CBRE. “U.S. Industrial & Logistics Market Overview – Q3 2025.” CBRE Research. September 2025.

• JLL. “U.S. Industrial Outlook – Q3 2025.” Research Reports. October 2025.

• Newmark. “National Industrial Market Report – Q3 2025.” Newmark Research. October 2025.

• NAIOP Research Foundation. “Addressing the Supply Chain’s Real Estate Requirements.” July 2025.

• Blackstone. “Real Estate Platform Overview – Link Logistics Focus.” Firm Publications. July 2025.

• STAG Industrial, Inc. “Q2 2025 Financial Results.” Investor Relations. August 2025.

• Rexford Industrial Realty. “Investor Presentation – September 2025.”

• EastGroup Properties. “2025 Mid-Year Industrial Sector Outlook.” Investor Reports.

• U.S. Census Bureau. “Quarterly Retail E-Commerce Sales – Q2 2025.” September 2025.

• Federal Reserve Board. “Beige Book Summary – October 2025.” U.S. Economic Conditions.

• PERE News. “Top Global Industrial Fund Managers and Capital Trends.” Q3 2025. “Beige Book Summary – October 2025.” U.S. Economic Conditions.