Summary
Sacramento underwrites outside the standard California frame on five structural variables: the SMUD power island, the Government Code Section 65865.5 flood statute, the Sustainable Insurance Strategy, the state-capital employment anchor, and a two-model growth geography. This research post carries each at the level a primary source supports, plus the USDA eligibility line and the Sacramento metro SBA 7(a) and 504 record computed from the FOIA file. It is the companion to the Sacramento feasibility study hub.
9 minute read.
Data as of June 2026. This companion research post carries the full structural and capital-markets detail behind the Sacramento feasibility study hub. Every figure below traces to a primary source named in the Sources list.
The five structural variables that reset Sacramento underwriting
Sacramento is the one California metro where five distinct, statute-rooted and structurally local variables collectively redefine the underwriting envelope for a commercial real estate, SBA or USDA feasibility study. Each is stated here at the level a primary source supports.
One, the SMUD municipal power island. The Sacramento Municipal Utility District is a community-owned electric utility serving most of Sacramento County as a service island inside the surrounding Pacific Gas and Electric investor-owned territory. SMUD states its residential rates are on average more than 50 percent lower than neighboring PG&E on a 750 kilowatt-hour monthly comparison as of June 1, 2026. In the surrounding PG&E counties, new interconnection runs under CPUC Electric Rule 21, and PG&E's cluster study process runs on the order of 18 to 20 months. Two otherwise identical buildings a few miles apart can therefore carry materially different power cost and interconnection lead time.
Two, the flood and levee statute. Under California Government Code Section 65865.5, added by Senate Bill 5 in 2007, a city or county in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley may not enter a development agreement for property in a flood hazard zone without finding, on substantial evidence, one of four conditions: that State Plan of Flood Control or other facilities protect the property to the applicable standard; that imposed conditions will provide it; that the local flood agency has made adequate progress toward it; or that an undetermined-risk-area property has met it. The standard in urban and urbanizing areas is the urban level of flood protection, a 200-year, 0.5 percent annual chance event.
Three, the California insurance dislocation. Commissioner Ricardo Lara's Sustainable Insurance Strategy took full effect January 1, 2025. Its catastrophe-modeling regulation lets insurers use Department of Insurance-reviewed forward-looking wildfire models in rate filings in place of the prior long-run historical average, and the Department had cleared three models for use by August 1, 2025. For Placer and El Dorado foothill sites in High or Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones, the study carries a bindable commercial quote or a FAIR Plan plus difference-in-conditions assumption in the expense projection.
Four, the state-capital employment anchor. Sacramento is the seat of California state government, and the state is the region's single dominant employer. Executive Order N-22-25, issued March 3, 2025, set a default of at least four in-person work days per week for state agencies under the Governor's authority from July 1, 2025, up from a two-day hybrid default. Downtown office and downtown-adjacent hospitality demand turns on the return-to-office posture rather than on a full recovery base case.
Five, migration and the two-model region. The metro's population sits mostly on the valley floor in Sacramento County, with the fast-growing edge in Placer and El Dorado counties. The region underwrites as two absorption models rather than one: a SMUD-core valley-floor model and a Placer-and-foothill model with different power costs, insurance availability and age structure. A Sacramento study runs both.
Sacramento SBA capital markets, computed from the FOIA file
Nationally, the U.S. Small Business Administration closed fiscal year 2025 having guaranteed 84,400 7(a) and 504 loans for $44.8 billion, comprising 77,600 7(a) loans for $37 billion and 6,750 504 loans for $7.8 billion, per SBA News Release 25-83 dated September 30, 2025. The Sacramento metro cut below is computed in-house from the SBA 7(a) and 504 FOIA release by county membership across the Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom Metropolitan Statistical Area, never read from an SBA district total, because the SBA Sacramento District spans 21 counties from the Oregon border to San Joaquin and any district figure overstates the metro.
In fiscal year 2025 the Sacramento metro recorded 656 7(a) approvals for $296,696,000 and 77 504 approvals for $109,405,000. The most active 7(a) lenders in the metro that year, by approval count, were Northeast Bank (97 loans); U.S. Bank, National Association (59 loans); Newtek Bank, National Association (55 loans); Banner Bank (34 loans); Columbia Bank (33 loans); Lendistry SBLC, LLC (31 loans); The Huntington National Bank (29 loans); Readycap Lending, LLC (29 loans). The most active 504 Certified Development Companies were Mortgage Capital Development Corporation (27 loans, $54,783,000); California Statewide Certified Development Corporation (11 loans, $8,786,000); Greater Sacramento Certified Development Corporation (10 loans, $10,606,000); Bay Area Employment Development Company (9 loans, $12,379,000); AMPAC Tri-State CDC, Inc. (9 loans, $6,761,000); Business Finance Capital (5 loans, $4,829,000). Mortgage Capital Development Corporation is the legal name of TMC Financing.
| Asset class | 7(a) loans | 7(a) gross approval | 7(a) charge-off rate | 504 loans | 504 gross approval | 504 charge-off rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hotels and motels | 112 | $253,596,700 | 0.0% | 38 | $107,233,000 | cohort under 30 |
| Car washes | 39 | $47,840,600 | cohort under 30 | 7 | $4,235,000 | cohort under 30 |
| Self-storage | 21 | $18,366,200 | cohort under 30 | 16 | $36,249,000 | cohort under 30 |
| RV parks and campgrounds | 5 | $7,429,000 | cohort under 30 | under 5 | ||
| Assisted living and continuing care | 109 | $98,410,400 | 2.0% | 15 | $22,219,000 | cohort under 30 |
| Gas stations and convenience stores | 126 | $235,915,800 | 0.0% | 8 | $12,310,000 | cohort under 30 |
| Restaurants, full and limited service | 476 | $219,547,000 | 13.7% | 36 | $26,479,000 | cohort under 30 |
| Fitness and recreational sports centers | 107 | $35,814,100 | 13.8% | 7 | $6,233,000 | cohort under 30 |
| Marinas | under 5 | under 5 | ||||
| Child day care services | 48 | $38,344,700 | cohort under 30 | 14 | $12,454,000 | cohort under 30 |
| All ten asset classes in this table | 1,044 | $958,207,500 | 8.2% | 143 | $231,334,000 | 0.0% |
Source: U.S. Small Business Administration, 7(a) and 504 FOIA release (label as of June 30, 2026); computed by MMCG. Charge-off rate shown only where the resolved cohort has at least 30 loans; a cell under five loans is suppressed.
The table reads by asset class the way a credit committee reads a market: restaurants carry the deepest count and one of the two highest charge-off rates in the resolved cohort, hotels and gas stations carry the largest dollar volumes, and a specialty class such as self-storage carries more 504 than 7(a) dollars. A charge-off rate is shown only where at least 30 loans have reached a terminal status, so the small classes read as cohort under 30 rather than a noisy percentage.
USDA eligibility geometry in the Sacramento region
USDA Business and Industry financing runs under the consolidated 7 CFR Part 5001. A rural area is one that is not in a city or town of more than 50,000 population and not in the urbanized area contiguous and adjacent to it, so the Sacramento urban core is ineligible while the region's smaller cities are generally eligible or partially eligible: Yuba City, Marysville and Wheatland; Woodland and Winters; Galt and Isleton; Colfax, Auburn and the Placer foothills; Placerville, Pollock Pines and Georgetown; and the Delta communities. Because the line can cut through a smaller city where its edge abuts a Census-defined urbanized area, the subject address is verified on the USDA eligibility map at intake.
A note on what this post does not claim
A Sacramento market piece would ordinarily carry submarket rents, vacancy rates, hotel occupancy and self-storage inventory. Those figures come from commercial market reports and are not carried here. What remains above is the statute, the federal program frame and the SBA record computed from the primary file, which is the part of a Sacramento study a lender can check.
Sources
- U.S. Small Business Administration, News Release 25-83, September 30, 2025
- U.S. Small Business Administration, 7(a) and 504 FOIA release (label as of June 30, 2026)
- U.S. Census Bureau, Population Estimates Program, Metropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical Areas, vintage 2024
- Sacramento Municipal Utility District, How our rates compare (June 1, 2026)
- California Government Code Section 65865.5 (Senate Bill 5, 2007)
- California Department of Insurance, Sustainable Insurance Strategy
- Office of Governor Gavin Newsom, Executive Order N-22-25, March 3, 2025
- Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, 7 CFR 5001.3
Cite this
Michal Mohelsky, J.D., FMVA (2026). The Sacramento Feasibility Market: SBA, USDA and Five Structural Variables. MMCG Invest, LLC. https://www.mmcginvest.com/post/sacramento-feasibility-market-2026
Where this goes next
- The service page for the program this analysis is aboutMMCG's feasibility study page for this subject.
