Summary
Philadelphia underwrites outside a national template on a set of statute and government rooted structural variables. This research post carries each at the level a primary source supports, plus the USDA eligibility line and the Philadelphia metro SBA 7(a) and 504 record computed from the FOIA file. It is the companion to the Philadelphia feasibility study hub.
8 minute read.
Data as of June 2026. This companion research post carries the full structural and capital-markets detail behind the Philadelphia feasibility study hub. Every figure traces to a primary source named in the Sources list. MMCG's city briefs use primary and FOIA sources and do not carry commercial rent, vacancy or occupancy figures.
The structural variables that reset Philadelphia underwriting
Philadelphia carries its own set of statute and government rooted variables that redefine the underwriting envelope for a commercial real estate, SBA or USDA feasibility study. Each is stated here at the level a primary source supports.
The Philadelphia Wage Tax. The Wage Tax is a defining cost of operating and employing in Philadelphia and has no clean national analogue. The City taxes the salaries, wages, commissions and other compensation of every Philadelphia resident regardless of where the job sits, and of every non-resident for services performed inside the city. Employers must register within 30 days of hiring a covered worker and withhold at the rate set by residency. For feasibility underwriting this raises effective labor cost and shapes tenant demand, so pro formas for office, medical and hospitality uses must carry it explicitly.
The Business Income and Receipts Tax (BIRT). The BIRT is unusual because it stacks a gross receipts levy on top of a net income tax, so a thin-margin or pre-stabilization operation can owe tax on receipts while showing no profit. Every corporation, partnership, LLC, association and individual doing business in the city files, including commercial and residential rental operators, and a return is due whether or not a profit was made. Combined with the separate Net Profits Tax, this materially affects the after-tax return in any Philadelphia pro forma and drives entity choice and holding structure for a project.
The 10-year abatement and the Development Impact Tax. The abatement drives almost every Philadelphia development pro forma. Ordinance 1130 grants a 10-year abatement for new construction or improvements to deteriorated industrial, commercial or other business properties, and parallel ordinances cover residential new construction and rehab, each running from January 1 after certified completion. The city also levies the Development Impact Tax on residential new construction over $15,000 that is eligible for an abatement, payable half at permit issuance and half at final inspection. Underwriting must model the tax holiday and the offsetting construction tax together.
Four-state metro with Delaware's no-sales-tax regime. Underwriting a deal in this metro requires knowing which state line it sits behind. The Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington statistical area spans four states with divergent tax and land-use rules, and Delaware is the sharpest contrast because it imposes no sales tax at all and taxes sellers through a gross receipts tax instead. A consumer-facing or logistics project is tested against the sales-tax regime of the state its parcel sits in, while Pennsylvania applies a conventional statewide sales tax. A national template that assumes one state regime will misstate operating costs, tenant economics and site selection throughout the region.
Historic designation and Historical Commission review. Philadelphia's large inventory of historic buildings creates a permitting layer that national templates omit. When a property is on the Philadelphia Register of Historic Places, the owner needs Historical Commission approval to change it, and review is required for construction, alteration and demolition, including additions, windows, doors and facade elements, while routine maintenance is exempt. This review runs alongside Licenses and Inspections permitting and can add time, design constraints and cost to adaptive reuse and redevelopment. Feasibility studies for older Philadelphia parcels must test designation status early because it can reshape scope, schedule and budget.
Philadelphia SBA capital markets, computed from the FOIA file
Nationally, the U.S. Small Business Administration closed fiscal year 2025 having guaranteed 84,400 7(a) and 504 loans for $44.8 billion, comprising 77,600 7(a) loans for $37 billion and 6,750 504 loans for $7.8 billion, per SBA News Release 25-83 dated September 30, 2025. The Philadelphia metro cut below is computed in-house from the SBA 7(a) and 504 FOIA release by county membership across the Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD Metropolitan Statistical Area, never read from an SBA district total.
In fiscal year 2025 the Philadelphia metro recorded 1,631 7(a) approvals for $763,756,900 and 47 504 approvals for $57,814,000, filed largely through the PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT OFFICE. The most active 7(a) lenders in the metro that year, by approval count, were TD Bank, National Association (376 loans); Northeast Bank (160 loans); Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company (144 loans); The Huntington National Bank (67 loans); Newtek Bank, National Association (66 loans); Wilmington Savings Fund Society FSB (64 loans); Meridian Bank (50 loans); Readycap Lending, LLC (47 loans). The most active 504 Certified Development Companies were Empire State Certified Development Corporation (17 loans, $9,813,000); Trenton Business Assistance Corporation (13 loans, $26,540,000); South Eastern Economic Development Company of Pennsylvania (10 loans, $9,691,000); Delaware Community Development Corporation (3 loans, $1,808,000); NEPA Alliance Business Finance Corporation (1 loan, $5,030,000); 504 Capital Corporation (1 loan, $3,177,000).
| Asset class | 7(a) loans | 7(a) gross approval | 7(a) charge-off rate | 504 loans | 504 gross approval | 504 charge-off rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hotels and motels | 107 | $290,435,300 | 3.0% | 20 | $57,260,000 | cohort under 30 |
| Car washes | 71 | $84,915,300 | 4.2% | 14 | $13,408,000 | cohort under 30 |
| Self-storage | 18 | $17,625,700 | cohort under 30 | under 5 | ||
| RV parks and campgrounds | under 5 | under 5 | ||||
| Assisted living and continuing care | 18 | $12,117,500 | cohort under 30 | under 5 | ||
| Gas stations and convenience stores | 61 | $46,938,100 | 6.2% | under 5 | ||
| Restaurants, full and limited service | 1,104 | $579,677,500 | 9.3% | 47 | $41,022,000 | cohort under 30 |
| Fitness and recreational sports centers | 293 | $129,284,200 | 17.4% | 16 | $27,475,000 | cohort under 30 |
| Marinas | under 5 | under 5 | ||||
| Child day care services | 343 | $232,229,000 | 6.7% | 23 | $23,154,000 | cohort under 30 |
| All ten asset classes in this table | 2,019 | $1,398,870,700 | 9.3% | 128 | $173,146,000 | cohort under 30 |
Source: U.S. Small Business Administration, 7(a) and 504 FOIA release (label as of June 30, 2026); computed by MMCG from the SBA FOIA loan file. Charge-off rate shown only where the resolved cohort has at least 30 loans; a cell under five loans is suppressed.
USDA eligibility geometry in the Philadelphia region
USDA Rural Development guaranteed loans, consolidated under 7 CFR Part 5001, reach only rural areas, defined at 7 CFR 5001.3 as any area not in a city or town of more than 50,000 inhabitants and not in the adjoining urbanized area, using the latest decennial census. Philadelphia itself is ineligible, but the metro's outer edges in Chester, Bucks and Montgomery counties in Pennsylvania, Gloucester and Salem counties in New Jersey, New Castle County in Delaware and Cecil County in Maryland hold genuinely small communities that are plausibly eligible; MMCG verifies eligibility at the subject address on the USDA eligibility map at intake.
A note on what this post does not claim
A Philadelphia market piece would ordinarily carry submarket rents, vacancy and absorption. Those come from commercial market reports, which MMCG's city briefs do not carry, so they are omitted rather than shown on a weaker source. What remains is the statute, the federal program frame and the SBA record computed from the primary file, which is the part of a Philadelphia study a lender can check.
Sources
- U.S. Small Business Administration, News Release 25-83, September 30, 2025
- U.S. Small Business Administration, 7(a) and 504 FOIA release (label as of June 30, 2026)
- U.S. Census Bureau, Population Estimates Program, Metropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical Areas, vintage 2024
- City of Philadelphia, Department of Revenue
- City of Philadelphia, Department of Revenue
- City of Philadelphia, Department of Revenue
- City of Philadelphia, Get a property tax abatement (Ordinance 1130: a 10-year abatement for new construction or improvements to deteriorated industrial, commercial or other business properties)
- Delaware Division of Revenue; City of Philadelphia Department of Revenue
- City of Philadelphia, Philadelphia Historical Commission
- 7 CFR 5001.3, U.S. Government Publishing Office (govinfo.gov)
- City of Philadelphia Department of Revenue; Pennsylvania Department of Revenue; Delaware Division of Revenue
Cite this
Michal Mohelsky, J.D., FMVA (2026). The Philadelphia Feasibility Market: SBA, USDA and Its Structural Variables. MMCG Invest, LLC. https://www.mmcginvest.com/post/philadelphia-feasibility-market-2026
Where this goes next
- The service page for the program this analysis is aboutMMCG's feasibility study page for this subject.
